Pavel Petrovich - “Pechorin of small sizes.” Pavel Petrovich - “Pechorin of small sizes”

The heroes of Lermontov and Turgenev - Grigory Aleksandrovich Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov - are people belonging to the same social group, but living in different times. After the massacre of the Decembrists in 1825, the time came for the generation about which M. Yu. Lermontov wrote: “... the cowardly is shameful before danger and despicable slaves before power...” This is not said about all the young and mature - it can be said about Pechorin should be spoken of as an extraordinary person, as a very interesting person. This is how M. Yu. Lermontov shows it when he draws unusual portrait Pechorin, talks about his actions (the abduction of Bela, the duel with Grushnitsky), about his friendship with Doctor Werner, about only love Pechorin to Vera Litovskaya, about the hero’s desire to find his place in life. You may or may not like Pechorin, but you cannot remain indifferent to him. The hero appeals to some with his straightforwardness, but offends others; some like his sincerity, while others see cruelty in it. Two or three episodes from the life of the hero M. Yu. Lermontov remain in the reader’s memory as an example of the hero’s honesty and decency, for example, an explanation with Princess Mary, and a duel with Grushnitsky, when Pechorin gives a person a chance to admit his mistakes and avoid a duel. But in the scene of farewell to Maxim Maksimych - cold, cruel - it seems that no one likes Pechorin, and rightly so.

There is essentially nothing to say about Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov... Pose is a very short description of his behavior. But there are points that deserve the reader's attention. In his dispute with Bazarov, Pavel Petrovich is right when he asserts that life, with its ready-made, historically grown forms, can be smarter than an individual or a group of people. Pavel Petrovich reproaches Bazarov for contempt for the people, the nihilist parries the reproach: “Well, if he deserves contempt!” Kirsanov talks about Schiller and Goethe, Bazarov exclaims: “A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than any poet!” etc. But if Pavel Petrovich comes to belittle the human personality in front of accepted principles, then Bazarov asserts his own personality at the cost of destroying authorities.

Pavel Petrovich's youth passed in the 1830s in an atmosphere of mute reaction, mature years coincided with the period of the “dark seven years”. He fails to understand the requirements new era, views younger generation are deeply alien to him. As Turgenev wrote: “Look into the faces of the “fathers” - weakness and lethargy or limitation.” Pavel Petrovich considers himself a liberal and a lover of progress. He talks a lot about the public good, but Bazarov is right when he tells him: “... you respect yourself and sit with your hands folded; What is the use of this? All of Pavel Petrovich’s principles boil down to one thing: to protect the old order.

Do these people - Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich - have anything in common? What allowed D.I. Pisarev to compare Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov with Pechorin “ small size"? First of all, I think, character traits: selfishness, conceit, indisputability in judgments, manner of dressing, behavior in society... In matters of principle, one should not, one simply cannot compare Pavel Petrovich with Pechorin.

At the end of the novel, I. S. Turgenev, talking about P. P. Kirsanov’s stay in Dresden, seems to put an end to this comparison: “... between two and four o’clock, at the most fashionable time for a walk, you can meet a man about fifty... elegantly dressed... This is Pavel Petrovich. Here he gets acquainted more with the British and with visiting Russians, in conversation with whom he gives free rein to his bile... He doesn’t read anything Russian, but on his desk there is a silver ashtray in the shape of a peasant’s bast shoe. He's still making noise..."

That's all. In the preface to the novel “A Hero of Our Time,” M. Yu. Lermontov offered the reader the following observation: “The history of the human soul, even the smallest soul, is almost more curious and not more useful than history a whole people." This can be attributed to Pechorin, but not to Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, I am not interested in him. So judge: does the elder Kirsanov look like “little Pechorin”? No, of course not! With all due respect to the judgments of Dmitry Ivanovich Pisarev...

The heroes of Lermontov and Turgenev - Grigory Aleksandrovich Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov - are people belonging to the same social group, but living at different times. After the massacre of the Decembrists in 1825, the time came for the generation about which M. Yu. Lermontov wrote: “... before danger the cowardly is shameful and before the authorities despicable slaves...” This is not said about all the young and mature - it can be said about Pechorin should be spoken of as an extraordinary personality, as a very interesting person. This is how M. Yu. Lermontov shows him when he draws an unusual portrait of Pechorin, talks about his actions (the kidnapping of Bela, the duel with Grushnitsky), about his friendship with Doctor Werner, about Pechorin’s only love for Vera Litovskaya, about the hero’s desire to find his place in life . You may or may not like Pechorin, but you cannot remain indifferent to him. The hero appeals to some with his straightforwardness, but offends others; some like his sincerity, while others see cruelty in it. Two or three episodes from the life of the hero M. Yu. Lermontov remain in the reader’s memory as an example of the hero’s honesty and decency, for example, an explanation with Princess Mary, and a duel with Grushnitsky, when Pechorin gives a person a chance to admit his mistakes and avoid a duel. But in the scene of farewell to Maxim Maksimych - cold, cruel - it seems that no one likes Pechorin, and rightly so. There is essentially nothing to say about Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov... Pose is a very short description of his behavior. But there are points that deserve the reader's attention. In his dispute with Bazarov, Pavel Petrovich is right when he asserts that life, with its ready-made, historically grown forms, can be smarter than an individual or a group of people. Pavel Petrovich reproaches Bazarov for contempt for the people, the nihilist parries the reproach: “Well, if he deserves contempt!” Kirsanov talks about Schiller and Goethe, Bazarov exclaims: “A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than any poet!” etc. But if Pavel Petrovich comes to belittle the human personality in front of accepted principles, then Bazarov asserts his own personality at the cost of destroying authorities. Pavel Petrovich's youth passed in the 1830s in an atmosphere of mute reaction; his mature years coincided with the period of the “gloomy seven years.” He is unable to understand the demands of the new era; the views of the younger generation are deeply alien to him. As Turgenev wrote: “Look into the faces of the “fathers” - weakness and lethargy or limitation.” Pavel Petrovich considers himself a liberal and a lover of progress. He talks a lot about the public good, but Bazarov is right when he tells him: “. ..you respect yourself and sit back; What is the use of this? All of Pavel Petrovich’s principles boil down to one thing: to protect the old order. Do these people - Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich - have anything in common? What allowed D.I. Pisarev to compare Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov with Pechorin of “small size”? First of all, I think, character traits: selfishness, conceit, indisputability in judgments, manner of dressing, behavior in society... In matters of principle, one should not, one simply cannot compare Pavel Petrovich with Pechorin. At the end of the novel, I. S. Turgenev, talking about P. P. Kirsanov’s stay in Dresden, seems to put an end to this comparison: “... between two and four o’clock, at the most fashionable time for a walk, you can meet a man about fifty... elegantly dressed... This is Pavel Petrovich. Here he gets acquainted more with the British and with visiting Russians, in conversation with whom he gives free rein to his bile... He doesn’t read anything Russian, but on his desk there is a silver ashtray in the shape of a peasant’s bast shoe. It's still making noise...” That's all. In the preface to the novel “A Hero of Our Time,” M. Yu. Lermontov offered the reader the following observation: “The history of the human soul, even the smallest soul, is perhaps more interesting and useful than the history of an entire people.” This can be attributed to Pechorin, but not to Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, I am not interested in him. So judge: does the elder Kirsanov look like “little Pechorin”? No, of course not! With all due respect to the judgments of Dmitry Ivanovich Pisarev...

Option No. 379573

The answer to tasks 1-7 is a word, or phrase, or sequence of numbers. Write your answers without spaces, commas or other additional characters; do not copy the answer words from the browser, enter them by typing them from the keyboard. For tasks 8-9, give a coherent answer in 5-10 sentences. When completing task 9, select two works of different authors for comparison (in one of the examples, it is permissible to refer to the work of the author who owns source); indicate the titles of the works and the names of the authors; justify your choice and compare the works with the proposed text in a given direction of analysis.

Performing tasks 10-14 is a word, or phrase, or sequence of numbers. When completing task 15-16, rely on the author’s position and, if necessary, express your point of view. Justify your answer based on the text of the work. When completing task 16, select two works of different authors for comparison (in one of the examples, it is permissible to refer to the work of the author who owns the source text); indicate the titles of the works and the names of the authors; justify your choice and compare the works with the proposed text in a given direction of analysis.

For task 17, give a detailed, reasoned answer in the genre of an essay of at least 200 words (an essay of less than 150 words is scored zero points). Analyze literary work, relying on the author’s position, drawing on the necessary theoretical and literary concepts. When giving an answer, follow the norms of speech.

If the option is given by the teacher, you can enter the answers to the assignments in Part C or upload them to the system in one of the graphic formats. The teacher will see the results of completing assignments in Part B and will be able to evaluate the uploaded answers to Part C. The scores assigned by the teacher will appear in your statistics.

Version for printing and copying in MS Word

C17.1. Why were two extraordinary personalities - Onegin and Tatyana - unable to find happiness in love? (Based on the novel by A. S. Pushkin “Eugene Onegin”)

C17.2. Do you agree with the opinion of D. I. Pisarev, who claims that Pavel Petrovich is a hero of the Pechorin type? (based on the novel by I. S. Turgenev “Fathers and Sons”)

C17.3. How are all the heroes of A. P. Chekhov’s play “The Cherry Orchard” alike?

C17.4. Hero - character - action in modern Russian prose. (Using the example of one of the works.)

To complete the assignment, choose only ONE of the four proposed essay topics (17.1-17.4). Write an essay on this topic in a volume of at least 200 words (if the volume is less than 150 words, the essay is scored 0 points).

Reveal the topic of the essay fully and multifacetedly.

Justify your theses by analyzing the elements of the text of the work (in an essay on lyrics, you need to analyze at least three poems).

Identify the role artistic means, important for revealing the topic of the essay.

Think over the composition of your essay.

Avoid factual, logical, and speech errors.

Write your essay clearly and legibly, observing the norms of writing.

C17.1. Why does the finale of the sixth chapter of A. S. Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin” sound like the theme of the author’s farewell to youth, poetry and romanticism?

C17.2. What does the fate of the gentleman from San Francisco symbolize and which other writers of the 20th century addressed the theme of “the well-fed”?

C17.3. Why did Sophia choose the inconspicuous Molchalin over the brilliant Chatsky?

C17.4. Why in the works of V. Shukshin the dispute between city and village was always resolved in favor of the village?

Solutions to Part C assignments are not automatically checked.
The next page will ask you to check them yourself.

Reveal the topic of the essay fully and multifacetedly.

Justify your theses by analyzing the elements of the text of the work (in an essay on lyrics, you need to analyze at least three poems).

Identify the role of artistic means that is important for revealing the topic of the essay.

Think over the composition of your essay.

Avoid factual, logical, and speech errors.

Write your essay clearly and legibly, observing the norms of writing.

C17.1. What gave F. M. Dostoevsky the basis to assert that Tatyana Larina should be recognized as the main character of A. S. Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin”?

C17.2. Is it possible to unequivocally say that ideological differences lie at the heart of the conflict between Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov? (Based on the novel by I. S. Turgenev “Fathers and Sons”)

C17.3. Is Margarita similar to the heroines of previous literature or is it new type heroines? (Based on the novel “The Master and Margarita” by M. A. Bulgakov)

C17.4. How is the theme “Man and War” revealed in the work (the work is chosen by the student)?

Solutions to Part C assignments are not automatically checked.
The next page will ask you to check them yourself.

Reveal the topic of the essay fully and multifacetedly.

Justify your theses by analyzing the elements of the text of the work (in an essay on lyrics, you need to analyze at least three poems).

Identify the role of artistic means that is important for revealing the topic of the essay.

Think over the composition of your essay.

Avoid factual, logical, and speech errors.

Write your essay clearly and legibly, observing the norms of writing.

C17.1. How is Tatyana’s “Russian soul” revealed in A. S. Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin”?

C17.2. Why can Bazarov be called a “reflective nihilist”? (Based on the novel by I. S. Turgenev “Fathers and Sons.”)

C17.3. How is the writer’s humanistic protest against the inhumanity of war expressed in M. A. Sholokhov’s story “The Fate of Man”?

C17.4. The theme of revolution and civil war in works Russian literature(using the example of one or two works).

I think the critic is right in his assessment. Turgenev deliberately emphasized the image of Bazarov with the help of dialogues. Disputes provide an opportunity to gain deeper understanding life principles characters. The main opponent of the hero is retired officer Kirsanov. The author confronts two extremes in the novel - a nihilist and an aristocrat, showing the need to find a golden mean.

Pavel Petrovich is about 45 years old.

He was born at the same time as Lermontov, his personality was formed in the 30s, in an atmosphere that gave birth to “superfluous” people like Pechorin. This is probably what an aged Lermontov hero would look like. In his youth, Pavel Petrovich was also characterized by skepticism, bile, “proud contempt” and seething “in empty action.” Drawing the image of Kirsanov, Turgenev notes that he was self-confident and mocking; brilliant career, But fatal love changed the fate of the nobleman.

The novel is permeated with ideological disputes. Compositionally in artistically The scene of the argument between the heroes in the tenth chapter is important. Pavel Petrovich proves: only empty and immoral people can live without “principles.” It is necessary to be guided by clear rules, even if they have become obsolete. Evgeniy Vasilyevich retorts that “principle” is a meaningless foreign word. In response to Kirsanov’s contempt for the people, Bazarov straightforwardly explains his attitude towards the ignorant peasant: “Well, if he deserves contempt!”

The author is attracted to the hero’s open radicalism by the lack of pretense, contempt for pompous phrases and impulse towards practical matters. Evgeniy is strong in denouncing Kirsanov’s conservatism, in criticizing the idle talk and lordly effeminacy of Russian liberals. He rightly notes that Pavel Petrovich uses clever words, but sits with folded hands.

The resolution of the ideological dispute occurs only in the 24th chapter, which tells of a duel between opponents. This episode was a natural consequence of the development of the plot. After the duel, Kirsanov Sr. confesses to his brother: “I’m starting to think that Bazarov was right when he reproached me for aristocracy.” In his opinion, it’s time for middle-aged people to stop breaking down and think about society; they need to put vanity aside.

At the end of the novel, Turgenev pronounces his verdict on conservatism, describing how Pavel Petrovich moistened his forehead with cologne and lay down: “... his emaciated head lay on a white pillow, like the head of a dead man... Yes, he was a dead man.” This sentence is the final point in the dispute between old and new, which was set by the author himself.

Effective preparation for the Unified State Exam (all subjects) -

The heroes of Lermontov and Turgenev - Grigory Alexandrovich and Pavel Petrovich - are people belonging to the same social group, but living in different times. After the massacre of the Decembrists in 1825, the time came for the generation about which M. Yu. Lermontov wrote: “... the cowardly is shameful before danger and despicable slaves before power...” This is not said about all the young and mature - about Pechorin it can also be said should be spoken of as an extraordinary personality, as a very interesting person. This is how M. Yu. Lermontov shows him when he draws an unusual portrait of Pechorin, talks about his actions (the kidnapping of Bela, the duel with Grushnitsky), about his friendship with Doctor Werner, about Pechorin’s only love for Vera Litovskaya, about the hero’s desire to find his place in life . You may or may not like Pechorin, but you cannot remain indifferent to him. The hero appeals to some with his straightforwardness, but offends others; some like his sincerity, while others see cruelty in it. Two or three episodes from the life of the hero M. Yu. Lermontov remain in the reader’s memory as an example of the hero’s honesty and decency, for example, an explanation with Princess Mary, and a duel with Grushnitsky, when Pechorin gives a person a chance to admit his mistakes and avoid a duel. But in the scene of farewell to Maxim Maksimych - cold, cruel - it seems that no one likes Pechorin, and rightly so.

There is essentially nothing to say about Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov... Pose is a very short description of his behavior. But there are points that deserve the reader's attention. In his dispute with Bazarov, Pavel Petrovich is right when he asserts that life, with its ready-made, historically grown forms, can be smarter than an individual or a group of people. Pavel Petrovich reproaches Bazarov for contempt for the people, the nihilist parries the reproach: “Well, if he deserves contempt!” Kirsanov talks about Schiller and Goethe, exclaims: “A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than any poet!” etc. But if Pavel Petrovich comes to belittle the human personality in front of accepted principles, then Bazarov asserts his own personality at the cost of destroying authorities.

Pavel Petrovich's youth passed in the 1830s in an atmosphere of mute reaction; his mature years coincided with the period of the "gloomy seven years." He is unable to understand the demands of the new era; the views of the younger generation are deeply alien to him. As Turgenev wrote: “Look into the faces of the “fathers” - weakness and lethargy or limitation.” Pavel Petrovich considers himself a liberal and a lover of progress. He talks a lot about the public good, but Bazarov is right when he tells him: “... you respect yourself and sit with your hands folded; what good does that do?” All of Pavel Petrovich’s principles boil down to one thing: protect the old one.

Do these people - Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich - have anything in common? What allowed D.I. Pisarev to compare Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov with Pechorin of “small size”? First of all, I think, character traits: selfishness, conceit, indisputability in judgments, manner of dressing, behavior in society... In matters of principle, one should not, one simply cannot compare Pavel Petrovich with Pechorin.

At the end of the novel, I. S. Turgenev, talking about P. P. Kirsanov’s stay in Dresden, seems to put an end to this comparison: “... between two and four o’clock, at the most fashionable time for a walk, you can meet a man about fifty... elegantly dressed... This is Pavel Petrovich. Here he knows more of the English and the visiting Russians, in conversation with whom he gives free rein to his bile... He doesn’t read anything Russian, but he has a silver coin on his desk. an ashtray in the shape of a man's bast shoe. It still makes noise..."

That's all. In the preface to the novel “A Hero of Our Time,” M. Yu. Lermontov offered the reader the following observation: “The history of the human soul, even the smallest soul, is perhaps more interesting and useful than the history of an entire people.” This can be attributed to Pechorin, but not to Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, I am not interested in him. So judge: does the elder Kirsanov look like “little Pechorin”? No, of course not! With all due respect to the judgments of Dmitry Ivanovich Pisarev...

How to download a free essay? . And a link to this essay; Pavel Petrovich - “Pechorin of small sizes.” Do you agree with this statement of D.I. Pisarev? (based on the novels “A Hero of Our Time” by M. Yu. Lermontov” and “Fathers and Sons” by I. S. Turgenev”) is already in your bookmarks.

quoted1 > > Pavel Petrovich - “Pechorin of small sizes.” Do you agree with this statement of D.I. Pisarev? (based on the novels “Hero of Our Time” by M. Yu. Lermontov” and “Fathers and Sons” by I. S. Turgenev”)

Additional essays on this topic

ideological character

best work