Analysis “Being famous is ugly...” Pasternak. Boris Pasternak - being famous is ugly

“Being famous is ugly...” analysis of the work - theme, idea, genre, plot, composition, characters, issues and other issues are discussed in this article.

Lyric poem by Boris Pasternak “Being famous is not nice...”, ironically, is as famous as its author himself. The first line, which has long become an aphorism, is an example proving how important it is that the beginning literary work instantly captivated the reader and forced him to greedily read the text further until the very end. In fact, already in the first line of his programmatic poem, the author formulates an artistic and personal position, which is very unusual for a poet. After all, it is known that creative people at all times have been in dire need of understanding and success. Often doubting everything, it is thanks to their enthusiastic attitude towards themselves that they understand that what they are doing is not in vain. However, Pasternak clearly distinguishes the concepts "hype" And "love of space" ("the call of the future"). This is the main antithesis poem, and it is intonationally reinforced by cross rhyme.

The poet emphasizes: recognition, if it has come, should be a natural consequence "dedication" in art, not "imposture". He seems to foresee the future glory of the real creator:

Others on the trail
They will pass your path by an inch,

- and immediately insists that the person "shouldn't differentiate" "defeat from victory". He needs complete acceptance of everything that happens to him as a sign of fate.

Modesty and dignity - this is what Boris Pasternak teaches his readers. And it seems that at the same time he is turning to himself, his inner voice and possible impulses of ambition in his own soul. Is this true? ... Let's see at what time and under what circumstances in the poet’s life this poem was created.

Dated 1956, the work was born in late period life and work of Boris Pasternak. By this time, the “great leader” had already passed away Soviet people"I. Stalin, who was glorified by a romantically minded poet a few years ago. A short period has already passed public recognition Pasternak in the Soviet Union and membership in the Writers' Union. The poet moved away from the general literary bustle and increasingly devoted himself to translations of works by foreign authors and risky activities to protect and support disgraced friends, among whom were Akhmatova and her son. The writer’s life included a rethinking of the events of past years and his path, and in this sense, it would not be wrong to assume that "It's not nice to be famous..."- a reminder both to yourself and to your fellow writers about true values and, of course, to the readers, who, in fact, create destructive hype around their idols.

Literary critics suggest that in this poem Boris Pasternak openly dissociates himself from creative path another famous contemporary and former like-minded person - Vladimir Mayakovsky. By that time it was customary to praise him without knowing the measure, as “ best poet modernity." The words belonged to Stalin, which for a long time determined the “inviolability” of Mayakovsky, who had already become a cult poet in the eyes of the people. In this “court path” Pasternak saw a terrible danger for creative person. And yet lyrical hero his poems do not at all drool with slander and do not hide in their words and intonations resentment towards the whole world for their own lack of recognition.

In every phrase one hears a conscious and hard-won truth. This is a stern sermon addressed to those who have the divine gift of inspiring and "to lift up" and who has forgotten or may forget their purpose on earth. “No need to start an archive, writes the author, Shake over manuscripts". And openly passes judgment

Shameful, meaningless
Be the talk of everyone.

Some exaggeration of the denial of the gift in in this case should work like a tub of cold water. This began the awakening from sleep, and it is expressed compositionally in the first two stanzas. Further, the author nevertheless moves on to discussions about what a poet should be like (both in the narrow and in the in a broad sense this word).

A poem written in complex, ever-changing verse size(spondee - pyrrhic - pyrrhic - iambic), has no external plot- only internal. This is the movement of the poet-philosopher’s thought from the denial of glory to the affirmation great power gift

...leave spaces
In fate, not among papers.

Metaphor "spaces" here the meaning of understatement takes on, motive for knowledge and searching for oneself, and lexical repetition of the word "alive" convinces the reader of the need to strive for spiritual life - "and only"!

“Being famous is ugly” Boris Pasternak

Being famous is not nice.
This is not what lifts you up.
No need to create an archive,
Shake over manuscripts.

The goal of creativity is dedication,
Not hype, not success.
Shameful, meaningless
Be the talk of everyone.

But we must live without imposture,
Live like this so that in the end
Attract the love of space to you,
Hear the call of the future.

And you have to leave spaces
In fate, and not among papers,
Places and chapters of a whole life
Crossing out in the margins.

And plunge into the unknown
And hide your steps in it,
How the area hides in the fog,
When you can't see a thing in it.

Others on the trail
They will pass your path by an inch,
But defeat comes from victory
You don't have to differentiate yourself.

And should not a single slice
Don't give up on your face
But to be alive, alive and only,
Alive and only until the end.

Analysis of Pasternak’s poem “It’s Ugly to Be Famous”

The creative path of Boris Pasternak was very difficult and extraordinary. Today he is rightfully considered one of the brightest Russian poets of the 20th century. However, their most famous works, including the novel Doctor Zhivago, which brought the author Nobel Prize, parsnip wrote in the era of the formation and development of the USSR. Naturally, in order to become a famous writer in a country with a totalitarian regime, it was necessary to have not only a bright and original talent, but also be able to hide his true feelings both in public and in works. Parsnips were never able to learn this, so they were periodically subjected to disgrace by the ruling elite. Nevertheless, he was popular, and his poems, novels and plays, which periodically disappeared from sale and were rejected by censorship, were published abroad and copied by hand. The author was really famous, but he was embarrassed to be recognized on the street and tried in every possible way to belittle his own contribution to literature. However, not all Soviet writers behaved this way. Many of them, not having even a hundredth part of Pasternak’s talent, considered themselves real geniuses and emphasized this in every possible way. Moreover, in those days it was not so much a literary gift that was valued as a loyal attitude to party politics.

Among creative intelligentsia Pasternak, for all his fame, had few friends. The poet himself explained this by saying that he was unable to maintain warm and trusting relationships with hypocrites and careerists. Those who were treated kindly by the authorities could afford to live in luxury, although from the pages of newspapers they called on the people for equality and fraternity. Therefore, in 1956, parsnip wrote his famous the poem “Being Famous is Ugly,” which was addressed to colleagues in the literary workshop. After the publication of this work, which was included in the collection “When it clears up,” many famous poets and the writers simply stopped greeting Pasternak, believing that he addressed his rhyming message to them personally. In fact, the author created a kind of code of honor for a writer, talking about how he sees a real poet or writer. In his opinion, modern writers you shouldn't worry about your own creative heritage, creating archives and “shaking over manuscripts.” Years will pass, and if these people were truly talented, then future generations of readers will appreciate it. If not, then carefully collected and sorted papers will forever gather dust in museum and library storerooms, unclaimed by anyone. The poet is convinced that “the goal of creativity is dedication, not hype, not success”. He calls on his colleagues to “live without imposture,” i.e. do not take credit for other people’s merits and do not try to look better in the eyes of others. According to Parsnip, life will put everything in its place anyway, and it will be much more important for posterity to know that the person whose works they admire was not a scoundrel. Therefore, the author is convinced that one must live in such a way as to “attract to oneself the love of space, to hear the call of the future.” In addition, the poet calls on fellow writers to “plunge into the unknown and hide your steps in it,” and not revel in power, money and prosperity, which predetermine fate and deprive a person of that spark in creativity, which is called talent.

Pasternak knows that history is created by people and interpreted by them to serve their own interests. Therefore, he is convinced that everything in this world is relative, and you should not revel in your achievements, which may be perceived completely differently after many years. The author believes that a real poet should not distinguish “defeats from victories”, because time will still judge everyone in its own way. And the only value that is an absolute value for Pasternak is the opportunity to “be alive” to the end, i.e. be able to sincerely love, despise and hate, and not portray these feelings to please someone in your works.

Being famous is not nice.
This is not what lifts you up.
No need to create an archive,
Shake over manuscripts.

The goal of creativity is dedication,
Not hype, not success.
Shameful, meaningless
Be the talk of everyone.

But we must live without imposture,
Live like this so that in the end
Attract the love of space to you,
Hear the call of the future.

And you have to leave spaces
In fate, and not among papers,
Places and chapters of a whole life
Crossing out in the margins.

And plunge into the unknown
And hide your steps in it,
How the area hides in the fog,
When you can't see a thing in it.

Others on the trail
They will pass your path by an inch,
But defeat comes from victory
You don't have to differentiate yourself.

And should not a single slice
Don't give up on your face
But to be alive, alive and only,
Alive and only until the end.

Analysis of the poem “Being Famous is Ugly” by Pasternak

The creative fate of B. Pasternak was very difficult. His works did not fit into the standards of Soviet ideology. The poet and writer was constantly subjected to devastating criticism. His work was under an unspoken ban. Only a small part of the works was published in their homeland, subjected to the strictest censorship corrections and distortions.

Despite this, Pasternak always remained true to his convictions. He never conformed to official requirements, believing that the duty and sacred responsibility of a real writer is to remain extremely sincere and express real, and not thoughts imposed by someone. Best works Pasternak was illegally distributed in lists and published abroad.

Few writers shared the beliefs of Boris Pasternak. The majority preferred to create mediocre works, the main criteria for which were loyalty to the authorities and praise of the leaders. Such waste paper was declared “masterpieces” of world literature, and its authors enjoyed artificial honor and respect.

In 1956, Pasternak wrote the poem “It’s Ugly to Be Famous,” in which he expressed his opinion about the true calling of a writer. The main goal He considers the writer not the achievement of fame and success, but maximum dedication and selfless service to art. IN Soviet era voluminous memoirs were very common, representing no artistic value. The “cult of personality” is deeply rooted in the consciousness. In a country that officially proclaimed universal equality and brotherhood, works were popular in which the authors endlessly exalted their role and merits in life.

Pasternak sharply criticizes this position. He believes that a person is not able to appreciate eigenvalue. His assessment will always be subjective. Therefore, we must not stick out our affairs, but, on the contrary, “plunge into the unknown.” Only the future is capable of passing a final verdict on a person and fairly considering his life path.

At the end of the work, Pasternak consolidates his thought. Instead of creating for himself a false aura of fame that can deceive his contemporaries, but not future generations, the writer must remain a living person and admit that he has human vices and weaknesses.

Time has proven the writer right. Many "masters" Soviet prose thrown into the dustbin of history. Pasternak is recognized as a global figure, a worthy winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature.

Boris Leonidovich Pasternak (January 29, 1890, Moscow - May 30, 1960, Peredelkino, Moscow region) - Russian writer, one of the greatest poets of the 20th century, winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature (1958).

The creative path of Boris Pasternak was very difficult and extraordinary. Today he is rightfully considered one of the brightest Russian poets of the 20th century. However, Parsnips wrote his most famous works, including the novel Doctor Zhivago, which brought the author a Nobel Prize, during the era of the formation and development of the USSR. Naturally, in order to become a famous writer in a country with a totalitarian regime, it was necessary to have not only a bright and original talent, but also to be able to hide one’s true feelings both in public and in his works. Parsnips were never able to learn this, so they were periodically subjected to disgrace by the ruling elite. Nevertheless, he was popular, and his poems, novels and plays, which periodically disappeared from sale and were rejected by censorship, were published abroad and copied by hand. The author was really famous, but he was embarrassed to be recognized on the street and tried in every possible way to belittle his own contribution to literature. However, not all Soviet writers behaved this way. Many of them, not having even a hundredth part of Pasternak’s talent, considered themselves real geniuses and emphasized this in every possible way. Moreover, in those days it was not so much a literary gift that was valued as a loyal attitude to party politics.

Among the creative intelligentsia, Pasternak, for all his fame, had few friends. The poet himself explained this by saying that he was unable to maintain warm and trusting relationships with hypocrites and careerists. Those who were treated kindly by the authorities could afford to live in luxury, although from the pages of newspapers they called on the people for equality and fraternity. Therefore, in 1956, Parsnip wrote his famous poem“Being famous is ugly,” which was addressed to colleagues in the literary workshop.
Pasternak knows that history is created by people and interpreted by them to serve their own interests. Therefore, he is convinced that everything in this world is relative, and you should not revel in your achievements, which may be perceived completely differently after many years. The author believes that a real poet should not distinguish “defeats from victories,” because time will still judge everyone in its own way. And the only value that is an absolute value for Pasternak is the opportunity to “be alive” to the end, i.e. be able to sincerely love, despise and hate, and not portray these feelings to please someone in your works.

“Being famous is ugly” Boris Pasternak

Being famous is not nice.
This is not what lifts you up.
No need to create an archive,
Shake over manuscripts.

The goal of creativity is dedication,
Not hype, not success.
Shameful, meaningless
Be the talk of everyone.

But we must live without imposture,
Live like this so that in the end
Attract the love of space to you,
Hear the call of the future.

And you have to leave spaces
In fate, and not among papers,
Places and chapters of a whole life
Crossing out in the margins.

And plunge into the unknown
And hide your steps in it,
How the area hides in the fog,
When you can't see a thing in it.

Others on the trail
They will pass your path by an inch,
But defeat comes from victory
You don't have to differentiate yourself.

And should not a single slice
Don't give up on your face
But to be alive, alive and only,
Alive and only until the end.

Don't sleep, don't sleep, artist,
Don't give in to sleep.
You are a hostage to eternity
Trapped by time.

Damn you, my dears! Why this particular poem, why this particular damn lesson, on this disgusting Monday? Oh, burn in hell - I am with you.

Being famous is not nice.
This is not what lifts you up.
No need to create an archive,
Shake over manuscripts.

The goal of creativity is dedication,
Not hype, not success.
Shamefully meaning nothing
Be the talk of everyone.

Hear the call of the future.

And you have to leave spaces
In fate, and not among papers,
Places and chapters of a whole life
Crossing out in the margins.

And plunge into the unknown
And hide your steps in it,

Others on the trail

But defeat comes from victory
You don't have to differentiate yourself.

And should not a single slice
Don't give up on your face

Alive and only until the end.

The poem “It’s Ugly to Be Famous” was written in 1956 and is included in Boris Pasternak’s lyrical cycle “When It Goes Wild” (1956-1959). In addition, it includes another 44 poems. The basis of this cycle of reflections on time, existence, truth, life and death, art and others philosophical topics. The release of the cycle of poems “When it clears up” is associated with the refusal in the USSR to publish the novel “Doctor Zhivago”.

The theme of the poem is philosophical.

We can say that this poem “Being Famous is Ugly” is instructive in nature, and Boris Pasternak himself plays the role of a mentor. He notes that “being famous is not beautiful,” explains “the goal of creativity is dedication,” and then begins to teach in verses 3, 4, 5 about how to live, what to do

But we must live without imposture,
Live like this so that in the end
Attract the love of space to you,
Hear the call of the future.

And you have to leave spaces
In fate, and not among papers,
Places and chapters of a whole life
Crossing out in the margins.

And plunge into the unknown
And hide your steps in it,
How the area hides in the fog,
When you can't see a thing in it.

And in the last 2 stanzas, explaining, gives instructions

Others on the trail
They will pass your path by an inch,
But defeat comes from victory
You don't have to differentiate yourself.

And should not a single slice
Don't give up on your face
But to be alive, alive and only,
Alive and only until the end.

The mood of the poem is sublime, solemn, aimed at success, desiring it. Creative life the poet was difficult, so he tried to understand why everything was happening this way, what he was doing wrong, and most importantly, how long would it still continue?

Perhaps, at the same time, he noticed that there are many in Russia who write precisely for fame, height, “noise” and “success”, at the same time not at all giving importance to what to write and what to write about.

You reread the poem and learn. You learn to understand the whole essence of writing, you learn to understand your role, not to become “noise,” but to “attract the love of space to yourself.” This poem encourages, inspires, encourages

But to be alive, alive and only,
Alive and only until the end.

The rhyme of the poem is cross. There are practically no epithets, personifications, metaphors or comparisons in the text. It is filled with verbs, participial phrases, complex and complex sentences - the author tried to give movement to his instructions, to encourage movement, to life, because “there is no standing position: either you move forward or backward.” By frequent alliteration to the hard sounds “n”, “r”, “d”, “t”, “zh” Pasternak gives his instructions firmness, steadfastness, and confidence, thereby expressing his position in life.