Stone of Atlantes: What are the recorded secrets of the universe hiding from people. Who and why hides true knowledge from people and turns the obvious into the secret, and the laws of nature into its riddles and anomalous phenomena
Stone of Atlantes: What are the recorded secrets of the universe hiding from people. Part one
The Egyptian plateau of Giza, guarded by the Sphinx, has since ancient times been considered a place that keeps the secrets of the gods, and in 1996, archaeologists discovered a tunnel under it, protected by a light field. With the help of instruments, it was possible to fix a source of powerful radiation, and then the Atlantean stone with the recorded secrets of the universe shed light on the appearance of mysterious artifacts.
When the gods command a man to speak.
In the 30s, the clairvoyant Edgar Cayce receives a revelation during a seance and hears a voice talking about a cache of ancient treasures under this historical monument. There were collected books along with artifacts left by the civilization of the Atlanteans. The records carved into stones dealt with topics that needed to be passed on to future generations. Then he called this place the Hall of Chronicles and offered to start excavations, but his words were not taken seriously. The prince of the king of the country in 1945 visited the plateau and sat down on a stone at the foot of the giant, but suddenly the earth trembled, and before the eyes of the man appeared strings of hieroglyphs along with ancient objects personifying the gods.
Researchers of the lost civilizations consider the buildings to be the work of extraterrestrial masters, the technologies of which cannot be repeated by modern people. The three famous pyramids have clear edges oriented to the cardinal points, and the blocks are processed in an ideal way. It is clear that no one could drag huge stones here by hand, so there were other ways to build such masterpieces. Before the Flood, representatives of an extinct race lived on earth, and in the 80s, scientists discovered traces of rain erosion on the surface of the Sphinx. So, it was built before the rise of Egypt, but who did people then consider gods?
One of the hypotheses speaks of space aliens who can move in space and oversee the entire development of mankind. Astronomers made a map of the galaxy with zones of life and saw that only in the Milky Way there are 1000 exoplanets where the development of life forms is possible, and they are much older than the earthly counterpart. The chronicles of China mention the sons of heaven, who brought culture to our planet. New Zealand legends speak of white gods who came here from heaven. What role did aliens play for mankind? One version suggests that they managed to transfer their knowledge to earthlings, after which they left them forever. The sons of the gods arrived here from Sirius and Orion, which gave impetus to the development of Atlantis.
Atlantean heritage.
It was first mentioned by Plato, who wrote that the mainland went under water in 9600 BC, when the pole shift began, which led to the flood. In the 80s, a Russian expedition, together with Alexander Gorodnitsky, discovered the sunken cities of an ancient civilization at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. This became a sensation, since the research took place in the place of a giant fault connecting the Eurasian and African plates. Basalt samples taken from here showed that they solidified on land, since Atlantis really existed.
Casey in his notes described in detail this country, which discovered the law of the action of universal forces, after which they could send a message through space to anywhere in the world. Also, the inhabitants traveled across the sky in airships, but they could still move in a different environment. After the catastrophe, they did not die, but began to live in different parts of the planet, which is eloquently evidenced by the legends of the Egyptians, who describe strange people, along with the god Thoth, who came from the sea. They were the keepers of extraterrestrial knowledge, and in the new country a secret order of the priests of Osiris was created.
This included only the initiated Atlanteans, led by Hermes Trismegistus. The most mysterious figure of antiquity still amazes scientists, as this man did things that went beyond the limits of people's capabilities. He became the builder of the first pyramid, where there were halls with columns, and also wrote a book that helps doctors diagnose and treat ailments. For thousands of years, Thoth was the chief Egyptian priest, along with members of the school who possessed secret knowledge. Beginners were subjected to an initiation ritual when they were covered in a sarcophagus with a lid weighing several hundred kilograms. They waited for a day for the decision of the council and did not know if they would come out of here.
Often a dangerous ritual led people to death, as they fell into a four-dimensional space that materialized their thoughts. Not everyone could endure such a test, because they had to control their emotions and terrible fears. The paranormal abilities of the Atlanteans gave them the opportunity to control this world and understand their essence - as part of the whole, expressing themselves in any form. In 1924, scientist John Kinneman found a mysterious chamber under the pyramid of Cheops, where time stopped and instruments failed. Here was an unknown mechanism called the anti-gravity machine. Recently, Russian researchers have recorded fields inside such structures that create special anomalies, and they are also powerful generators.
Pyramids are able to capture the seismic energy of the Earth and transform it several hundred times. The tops of ancient buildings were made of an alloy of tin along with copper and gold, and then a magic crystal was placed here - Merkaba, which fell from the sky. Initiates gathered around objects and created a sound that became a signal that went to other worlds, and the blow of the wand completed such actions. The stone had light energy that could control gravity and create vortexes that opened up parallel worlds. On Egyptian bas-reliefs, you can see images of a UFO hanging over the pyramids, so Giza was used by ancient people as a spaceport, but then the crystal disappeared from the top to be safely hidden by the priests, and the Sphinx points the way to it.
Fast forward to 1450 BC and look into the Karnak Temple, where the ancient shrine of the Atlanteans is kept. It is securely hidden from view, and even the pharaoh does not have access to the Merkaba. But once a year, a secret ceremony of Osiris is held here, when newcomers are initiated by adepts. Akhenaten became the first hunter of the sacred stone, and his actions were aimed at obtaining an artifact and gaining unlimited power. The reform of religion became the reason for the transfer of shrines to the new capital, where he intends to store this relic. Suddenly, the priests of the temple became outlaws, and then the members of the order secretly took the Atlantean crystal out of the country to Tibet, where amazing events began to take place. But you will already learn about this from the continuation of the article ...
To be continued...
“Exposure of false scientists and academicians!”, “Forbidden knowledge about the world around us!”, “Science guards the interests of the authorities!”, “Scientific conspiracy scheme”, “Sinister methods of the scientific community”, “Secret knowledge cannot be hidden!”
I'm sure everyone has already come across such flashy headlines and readers of what is written under them. If you try to visualize the ideas of a certain part of citizens about scientists and their activities, they will look something like this:
The time has come for me to do my part, and I also decided to tear a little of the covers from the shining body of truth.
A certain part of the citizens have a strong belief in the existence of a gloomy conspiracy of silence, concealment and falsification of true knowledge. Adherents of the version of the "conspiracy of scientists" believe that instead of true knowledge, scientific knowledge is brazenly concocted, which are actually just scientific and splurge, and they are created for convenient cheating of the redneck masses. I will list the most basic and frequent accusations against science, which, as it were, confirm the existence of a conspiracy:
No. 1. There is an agreement between scientists to hide some knowledge that is extremely inconvenient for official science. Scientists are taking such steps, because science is extremely conservative, inert, businessmen from science earn money on this topic, and too much will have to be revised and canceled, which is uncomfortable and unpleasant.
No. 2. Somewhere in deeply classified storerooms, special stores, secret libraries and gloomy basements, manuscripts, tablets or objects that overturn the entire building of modern science are sadly languishing, but they are not shown for reason #1
No. 3. Science is highly inaccurate, often wrong, and largely untrustworthy for reasons #1 and #2. Therefore, it can be trusted only in individual cases, or it is better not to trust it at all. It automatically follows from this that any craziest hypothesis or version has equal rights with scientific theories. Moreover, the fact that people do not have education in the field in which they develop their ideas does not matter.
I answer point by point
No. 1. Scientists conspiracy. And also: hushing up secrets, hiding artifacts, destroying inconvenient inventions, serving the authorities. (First, let's define. A scientist is a representative of science who carries out meaningful activities to form a scientific picture of the world, whose activities and qualifications have been recognized by the scientific community, a person who studies objective reality empirically and operates only with facts that can be reliably confirmed or refuted, a specialist in any scientific field and made a real contribution to it).
A little about my experience of communicating with scientists. My place of work is a caretaker at the largest archaeological complex, and every year I have to communicate with scientists from different fields, someone comes for work, someone just to relax. I can say that it is difficult to find people who are more dissimilar to each other. I can't resist telling you a funny story. It happened three years ago, as usual, a group of tourists arrived and began to roam the rocks, when suddenly a man separated from the group. Coming straight up to me with resolute steps, he immediately gave his name and surname and asked menacingly - what did I read from him? I, in some confusion from such pressure, answered, - nothing, and asked, - why should I suddenly read it? To which he replied - that he is a very prominent scientist and I must know him. Immediately, he literally handed me a look at a thick book, which he carried everywhere with him, on which it was indicated that he was its author and that he had a lot of all sorts of solid scientific titles. The following year, I got into a conversation with his colleague, who came to us and worked with him for a while. She said that he was really a great specialist in his field, but he had an extremely inflated sense of his own importance. She even remembered a funny episode, how he, having thrown a scandal, demanded from the collegium, which produces a textbook for students in his specialty, that he, along with the great classical scientists, be mentioned on the first pages as the founder of this science.
There were other unusual individuals, for example, in different years I came across people with candidate and other titles several times, after talking with whom it was clear that they peacefully coexist in faith in mystical phenomena and at the same time critically rational thinking.
The vast majority among scientists, of course, are ordinary, normal personalities, and they have as many oddities and peculiarities as all other people. The only significant difference from the majority is the desire to learn, professionally realized in constant scientific activity. Based on my observations, I can say for sure that most scientists are interested in the process of cognition itself, and not in the benefits that their status provides. Every scientist, no less than an alternative person, painfully wants to know the secrets and mysteries of the universe, it is this desire that leads most of the people to science. That is, their activity is mainly in the name of an idea, and there are simply no tools and incentives to force scientists to unite in the name of serving something. To unite them all without exception with a conspiracy or any other idea (except for the idea of scientific knowledge of the world) is absolutely impossible purely technically. The global conspiracy of scientists is the same absurdity as, for example, a conspiracy of nursing mothers, bald taxi drivers or residents of all houses on the 3rd floor.
No. 2. conservatism of science. (And also its inertia, obscurantism, anti-innovation, narrow-mindedness, reactionary, ignorance). Cases of allegedly ignorant conservatism, innumerable, I will briefly talk about the three most famous. Non-existent meteorites, harmful bacteria, motionless continents.
In 1768, on September 13 in the region. Luce, France, a meteorite fell, with a large number of witnesses. The Royal Academy of Sciences of Paris had already received such evidence before, and they decided to finally figure it out. A commission was created, which included well-known scientists at that time: the mineralogist Fougereau, the pharmacist Cadet and the physicist Lavoisier. The testimonies of people, as well as the stones themselves, were studied in the most detailed way. After that, a report was published in the "Physical Journal" for 1777. In a detailed report, it was said that the stone could not fall from the sky - these are the inventions of eyewitnesses, it is of an earthly nature and that it really has some properties that are not common, but most likely due to the fact that lightning hit it. In 1803, after a meteorite fall in Normandy, again on behalf of the (renamed because of the revolution) academy, the physicist Biot compiled an accurate description of its fall. After that, the reality of the existence of meteorites was recognized.
At the beginning of the 20th century, a large number of physicians believed that many human organs were not needed, and all bacteria were harmful. Here is what the biologist and Nobel laureate Ilya Mechnikov wrote in his “Etudes on Nature”: “Now there is nothing bold in asserting that not only the caecum with its appendage, but even all human large intestines are superfluous in our body and that their removal led to to very desirable results. Considered useless or even harmful: tonsils, appendix, thymus, pineal gland, etc. Views were widespread that the removal of these organs prevents poisoning of the body with the waste products of putrefactive bacteria. The practice of mass removal of some of these organs was widespread until the 1950s. After that, it gradually became clear that bacteria are necessary for the body to work and that each organ has its own useful function. All organs were rehabilitated, the last were the tonsils (tonsils). At the end of the 20th century, it was convincingly proven that they are one of the barriers for pathogenic microbes, in which protective proteins are produced. And the practice of mass removal of them from people was recognized as a mistake. For example, in the United States in the 1930s, the tonsils were removed from more than half of the children, i.e. tens of millions of people.
Until the 1960s, the "contract hypothesis" dominated - in it, all geological processes on the Earth were explained by processes of reducing its volume, i.e. compression. It was believed that it was compression that forms folds-mountains, cracks-faults and all other features of the landscape. In 1912, L.A. Wegener (a German meteorologist and geologist) presented his hypothesis at a meeting of the German Geological Association in Frankfurt am Main. In it, based on the data and observations he collected, he suggested that all continents slowly move in horizontal directions. This hypothesis immediately had some supporters. But the scientific community completely rejected this theory. In the 1960s, a huge amount of new data on the structure of the earth was obtained (a detailed map of the bottom of the world ocean was compiled, the speed of magma convection was measured - 1 cm per year, magnetic field reversals were discovered, the fact of the movement of continental plates was established - with the help of precise measurements, etc.) As a result, Wegener's hypothesis, with some refinements, was recognized as correct. Now it is generally recognized and is constantly supplemented with new data.
What does all this tell us? First, in recognizing incorrect (from the point of view of modern knowledge) theories, science was at that time in its own right, because then (with that level of tools, knowledge, methods and experience) these theories best explained the world around them without involving unnecessary entities in the form mysticism and obscurity. Here it is necessary to explain a little: the purpose of any scientific theory is to economically explain as many facts as possible. If a theory appears that explains even more facts and even shorter and more understandable formulations, then it will inevitably replace the previous one. Such is the essence of science and such is the evolution of scientific views. Therefore, calls to recognize any (mystical, alternative, esoteric, etc.) theory without a sufficient number of facts confirming it look rather strange. It is usually argued that science will only benefit from this and become more useful. But such actions would be as absurd as trying to attach a horse and cart to the side of the spacecraft, in the hope that their joint thrust will increase the overall efficiency of the entire object.
In many respects, this is why science has made such progress over the past 200 years that it has got rid of appendages in the form of magic, mysticism, etc. and, in principle, is not engaged in research, which cannot be reliably measured and investigated.
Secondly, there is another feature of science that many do not like and is a frequent reason for its accusations. Sometimes it happens that there are a certain number of firmly established facts, but still they are not enough to create a theory on their basis. In this case, the problem is simply left for later and, as it were, moved into a distant box - until more facts accumulate and technical capabilities grow. For example, it was with the mass of the universe, it was more or less learned to calculate by the 1950s, but it turned out to be a huge discrepancy with the observed picture. In the early 2000s, large teams undertook targeted large-scale research in this direction, involving all available opportunities (a network of telescopes, powerful computers, launching space probes, etc.), as a result, dark matter and dark energy were discovered, explaining gravitational anomalies (but in the end it raised even more other questions about the nature of itself) which led to a revision of the model of the universe.
No. 3. Not the precision of science. It should be noted right away that none of the adequate scientists ever claims the complete infallibility of scientific theories. Each of them has its weak points and white spots. But the fact of the matter is that in any theory of alternatives (when compared with scientific theory), there are an order of magnitude more weak points and white spots. And then, scientists always recognize the unconditional right of alternative theories to compete with scientific ones, and even more so the right to their existence. But here is an important condition - they must be soundly worked out with the involvement of scientific methods. Unfortunately, most of what alternative figures offer cannot even be called a scientific theory; rather, it is some kind of informational garbage that has grown on fried, and not on verifiable facts.
Often one can also hear the accusation that science does not evaluate, study, consider, or at least expose many alternative theories that continuously generate many figures and which then find a lively response from some part of the citizens. But this is also easily explained. One of the generally accepted rules for conducting a dialogue looks like this: “the burden of evidence should always lie with the approving side.” Imagine the following situation: a group of people was seated opposite you, giving them the task of a couple of hours to tell you all their theories. And you were given the task to refute them or confirm them. And here you are sitting, and all these two hours every ten seconds they are shouting out a new ridiculous idea of \u200b\u200bthe universe. Will you manage to sort them all out and adequately answer? Science is in the same position, the number and variety of non-scientific hypotheses is such that even 100 times more scientists will not be enough to expose all this. And it is not part of the function of science to directly fight illiterate theories.
Tesla's important conclusion, made by him in the course of his research and experiments, was the discovery of a new physical truth: there is no energy in matter, except for that received from the environment. At the same time, the reserves of this energy, according to Tesla's calculations, are practically unlimited. It is no coincidence that his main discoveries and developments in the field of using free and easily accessible cheap energy are still hidden from the broad masses - they can easily bankrupt existing ones on a "rip off" ordinary people fuel and energy and transport TNCs.
We are simply forced to pay (because there is no alternative) for the use of imperfect and outdated technologies, those forces that literally "sit on oil and gas pipes", while receiving fabulous profits. And, for example, V. Line points to the possibility of technologies that make it possible to obtain clean energy 1058 times more than input energy.
There are other characteristic examples of concealing advanced discoveries from the world community, for example, the developments of the Russian physicist I.S. Filimonenko, which can change the life of mankind, raising it to a qualitatively new level. For example, back in 1957, he created an absolutely environmentally friendly installation for the production of electricity. The "side" effect of its use made it possible to destroy the radioactive contamination of the environment after a disaster similar to Chernobyl. In addition, it could produce helium-4, which NASA plans to deliver from the Moon as "cheap" fuel.
The scientists also developed an aircraft capable of "relying" on the Earth's magnetic field (the principle of antigravity). This device outwardly resembles a "flying saucer", and at the heart of its mover are two large disks made of different alloys. The lift force is generated by the rotation of these disks. Especially for this aircraft, the scientist came up with a unique material - neurolite, which is a hundred times stronger than steel and harder than diamond.
Another interesting development of the scientist is greenhouses with vacuum insulation. They carried out the corresponding calculations, which proved that even in winter, when the sun is covered by clouds, it receives 132 watts of energy per 1 square meter, and if you build greenhouses from neuronite, which has the property of transparency, then in Russia you can get four crops a year. And if, in addition, the vacuum panels are also equipped with turbine thermionic and plasma converters, then such a greenhouse turns into a power plant that can ensure independence from energy corporations. Prototypes of such greenhouses were manufactured by the Likhoborsky experimental production, and their effectiveness was proven in practice. However, they did not go into mass production, due to the fact that, at the behest of certain forces, the essence of which is hostile to the vast majority of humanity, a number of artificially created "difficulties" appeared with the introduction of products into production.
Filimonenko also conducted interesting studies, revealing the effect of radiation levels on life expectancy. In particular, he revealed that the life expectancy of people many millennia ago significantly exceeded the current one. This was due to the fact that the level of radiation in those days was much lower. Therefore, if a person's life expectancy is inversely proportional to the perceived dose of radiation, then in order to increase it, people need to be fed with normal, environmentally friendly products that can be grown in environmentally friendly greenhouses with an unlimited supply of heat.
Why are all these interesting inventions and developments not being introduced into production? Evidently, there are forces that are sufficiently invested with power, for which it is unprofitable to increase the length and conditions of life of ordinary people. Therefore, these forces purposefully hamper the development of official science, and promising developments remain far from mass implementation.
These forces are trying to completely subjugate public opinion in order to impose "values" on ordinary people that make it easy to manipulate their behavior. To this end, strife, doubts are sown and conflicting views are planted. They carefully try to confuse people in order to deprive them of their own opinion. In this case, they are ready to dutifully perceive any information slipped to them by such forces as an indisputable truth. For example, such is the unshakable faith in the immutability and finality of the existing scientific paradigm, limited by the framework of gross matter.
In order to achieve power over people, their weaknesses and bad habits are put at the forefront. Through envy, hatred, fear and strife, wars and revolutions, epidemics and famines come into our world, which should accustom people to an endless pursuit of pleasure and destroy faith in God and in the possibility of the existence of consciousness after the death of the physical body. All this makes humanity an easy prey in the hands of certain forces that uncontrollably use all the benefits that are carefully hidden from humanity itself.
Interesting in this aspect is the history of another Russian unique - A. Meleshchenko - the author of the original theory of antigravity, which also continues to be hidden and hushed up from the broad masses of people. Here, for example, is how he himself talks about his attempts to introduce the gravity engine he developed into production: “In 2001, I tried to get a patent for a gravity engine, but the work was withdrawn. In 2004, there was a second attempt. The claims were published in BIPM No. 10 (3 hours) on April 10, 2005. p.790. Application No. 2004. 117587/06(13)A. 7F 03G 7/00. But as a result of the subsequent technical examination, it turned out that the invention used a large number of unknown and nowhere published scientific discoveries. There were doubts about the appropriateness of issuing a patent. And the information published by me in non-scientific publications is not considered. Earlier, January 15, August 15, 1990 in VNIIGPE, I submitted applications for discoveries, but were withdrawn.
Alone, I could not provide experimental evidence. I also could not publish in scientific publications how to check it, dissent does not work with us. That is why an inquisitorial department was created at the Academy of Sciences (to combat pseudoscience). In 2001, he called the Academy of Sciences, they answered: "you publish, and we read." But only this theory from the editorial boards ended up in the USA, at the beginning of November 2002 it was shown on television. Not only scientists, but apparently all scientific developments are in the United States. It was about the existence of antimatter energy in nature, and if this is experimentally confirmed, then the theory of modern physics is not suitable anywhere. They received little information. And I have long developed on the basis of these discoveries the creation of a gravitational engine that works and receives energy according to the principle of a tornado.
Engineers have long noticed that the efficiency vortex plants often exceed 100%, but they do not know where the energy comes from. The power of the gravitational engine is enormous, it receives energy only at the surface of the earth, just like a tornado. And the energy of a tornado is comparable to an atomic bomb. The design of the engine is very simple, but it is impossible to create it at home. Heat-resistant alloys are used, as in a jet engine. We standardly train specialists at scientific institutes, how identical toys are stamped at a factory. By the end of their studies, they lose the most important thing, the ability to independently solve scientific problems. They believe in the false theories in nuclear physics textbooks without questioning them, but these theories lack the most important thing - experimental evidence. For example, there is no experimental evidence that the speed of gravity is equal to the speed of light.”
The MILF website www.site and its collegium differs from other Russian sites in that it always contains articles about what others, including television and media from different countries, dare to talk about only years later. Today we present to your attention, as well as to the attention of various scientific circles and government agencies, another exclusive and unique article, which is not just an article, but the beginning of a new, as it were, anti-scientific, although deeply thought out, direction of philosophy. The author of this article is the scientific secretary of the educational organization Society "Knowledge to the People", a researcher and author of a number of books and articles on such sensitive issues of our time Podshivalova V.V., which shows the meaninglessness of all modern "scientific progress". She makes a well-deserved reproach to modern science in hiding the true knowledge necessary for the full development of society and for human life, and promises to reveal the very hidden hidden truth in a series of her articles. The truth that each of us knows and understands on a subconscious level, but hides in the depths of our souls under the yoke of modern "scientific" "progress" and even pressure from such pseudoscientists. The truth that gives anyone (even an absolutely uneducated person) the keys to unraveling the mysteries and mysteries of nature, and even anomalous phenomena that are not actually such by nature, but turned into them thanks to the "diligent efforts" of scientists who erased and hid true knowledge from us, with the aim of populating our minds with other "scientific" knowledge and values, in order to increase their personal well-being and imaginary authority.
Writer-publicist, author of theory and scientific works studies of the energy-information state of space, head of the board of the MIUFA, deputy. Chairman of the Board of the Society "Knowledge to the People"
Petr Iv. Kikilyk
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Academic Council of MILFA, Chairman of the Board of the Knowledge to the People Society
Stanislav Nick. Nekrasov
Researcher, scientific secretary
regional educational and educational
organization Society "Knowledge to the People"
Veronika Podshivalova
Who and why hides true knowledge from people and turns the obvious into the secret, and the laws of nature into its riddles and anomalous phenomena?
From the series of articles “Unconscious and unidentified by no one, subject to no one, but completely controlling a person’s life”
Mankind daily, hourly, every second strives for knowledge of the whole world around us, tirelessly moving from ignorance to knowledge. And it sincerely believes that it solves the mysteries of nature and history. Scientists convince us that it is thanks to their merits that humanity has received the necessary knowledge and enlightenment. As a result, what was frightening is already perceived in the "natural form", the amazing and mysterious seems natural. For example, no one is afraid of an eclipse of the sun, because we were told that the reason for this phenomenon was allegedly clarified. At the same time, scientists do not understand why the eclipse occurs, and who is in charge of it. In addition, humanity is regularly told to enjoy regular technical innovations and supposedly it has in its arsenal a lot of medicines for intractable diseases.
Unfortunately, I have to disappoint the entire scientific world. My long-term observations and research have shown two things:
1. Our ancestors had much more knowledge about everything than we have now, moreover, they had true knowledge.
2. For a number of reasons, this true knowledge was destroyed and erased in our memory (in our brains), but there are places where this memory has been preserved, and each person can easily use it and for this you absolutely do not need to be a scientist or have any or special abilities. Although there are limitations here too, limitations not by the existing level of knowledge and knowledge and the current level of development of science, but by the level of what we are “allowed to know”.
It is precisely the fact that we have all forgotten, that no one is hiding from us, but we do not see it at all, and the one who and what and why is still hiding from us is dedicated to the series of my articles “No one is completely unconscious and unidentified , which is not subject to anyone, but completely controls the life of a person. In these articles, I will tell you something that no one wants to argue with, agreeing with my every word that does not contradict modern science, but at the same time, my statements will debunk the high importance of modern science familiar to us. I will not give figures, dates, analytical tables and other things necessary for scientific articles, but I will try to explain everything as is customary in the common people “on the fingers” in order to make my articles understandable to anyone, and not just to the scientific world. And for those who want to get evidence and facts, there is the Internet, which is full of such facts and scientific articles with evidence in abundance.
To clearly show the absurdity of statements that science has gone far ahead, I will show you the example of two categories of our ancestors. The first category is "close" ancestors, those whom we remember from the stories of our older generation, passed from mouth to mouth from generation to generation, roughly speaking, people of the last centuries and up to "modern" centuries. The second category is the most "distant" ancestors - which in science are called previous civilizations. Modern science does not deny the existence of ancient civilizations, does it? No! So, I have not written anything anti-scientific now.
And now we turn to what is now attributed to the achievements of modern science. For example:
- technical progress. Progress has been made, but compared to what? With the technical level of previous civilizations? So now it is not a secret for modern science that we have not achieved even a small grain of the technical progress that our "distant" ancestors had, the so-called scientifically - previous civilizations. A striking example of this is the Egyptian pyramids, the construction technologies of which are still not available to us. Progress compared to the technical level of "close" ancestors on the face. Scientists beat their chests, receive awards and take pride in the fact that they were able to achieve what our ancestors could not. And no one has any questions: why "close" ancestors could not master that level of technical development? What was stopping them? Not enough resources? Underdeveloped brain? Illiteracy? Lack of necessary knowledge and knowledge? Or maybe it’s the other way around, “close” ancestors had much more knowledge then than all the scientists of the world have now and today? Maybe they understood that it is precisely the current level of technical development that will destroy the main natural organism - the planet Earth, thanks to which we continue to live, while destroying humanity itself? Yes, you heard right, finally, modern scientists “knew” that the Earth is alive. In recent years, more and more scientists have declared that the Earth is a living intelligent organism that knows about the existence of human civilization and observes its activities. Water is compared to blood, mountain ranges to the spine, and so on. That is, in fact, the Earth is exactly the same organism as the human one. And the ancient people, our "close" ancestors, knew this very well and used this knowledge in their lives instead of chasing some kind of progress, and did not try to start building their lives in a scientific way, violating the laws of nature, as our main organism . For example, the phenomenon of "day-night". "Close" ancestors did not need scientific knowledge in order to properly use this phenomenon. They, having no modern technical innovations, lived "according to the rules" of nature, woke up with the sunrise, and fell asleep with its sunset. All work was carried out during the daytime. At the same time, they did not need a clue why the daylight hours are longer in summer, when it is just the time for harvest, and in winter, when nature is hibernating, the day is shorter. The life of "close" ancestors went in the same rhythms as the life of the planet itself. We look at what technical progress has given us: humanity does not sleep at night being carried away by modern achievements - TV, the Internet, communication and games in gadgets; the morning does not begin at dawn, but from the moment when the working day begins, and the day also ends much later than sunset. At the same time, all scientists are sounding the alarm due to the fact that the number of various diseases is increasing, they do not perceive real things, that this comes from an elementary systematic lack of sleep. Modern man does not hear the rhythms of the earth, scientists suggest something else to him, and gradually destroys himself. It's like a heart arrhythmia disease, the heart beats not according to the laws of the human body, but as it pleases or can, for reasons of deviation of a sick heart from a healthy one. Such an arrhythmic heart is recognized even by scientists as sick and a person dies before people with a healthy heart. But no one notices the deviation of the human rhythm from the rhythm of the earth against the background of technological progress, only fixing an increase in the death rate and a decrease in the birth rate. So were our "close" ancestors so stupid that they could not progress technically, or deliberately avoided such progress so as not to destroy themselves? After that, it is safe to say that the "Close" ancestors were much smarter than our advancing technical generation. They adapted to the rhythm of the Earth, and therefore could use its full potential. They did not disturb nature with modern vehicles and equipment for harvesting and planting crops in pursuit of increasing productivity, but knowing how to plant plants correctly, putting certain energy into them, they received more crops than the most modern farms and farms that use the latest technology now give. modern highly effective fertilizers and seeds. And environmental scientists did not sound the alarm at that time, because no one polluted or violated the environment. So what is the progress achieved by modern scientists - technicians? The progress of the destruction of the natural, the progress of the transformation of a healthy heart system of the Earth (humanity) into an arrhythmic one? The transformation of living nature into inanimate?
- modern medicine. She reached, according to scientists, great heights. New medicines for various viruses and diseases are regularly invented, pharmaceuticals in our country are more developed in places than industry, the number of pharmacies exceeds the number of grocery stores. Huge progress in modern times. And how did our ancestors survive without such progress? How could they live without life-saving drugs? Why didn't they develop and invent more and more new drugs? Firstly, most modern diseases are artificially created, for example, cancer, AIDS, urogenital infections, endless new influenza and SARS viruses, etc. The creation of new types of diseases has always kept pace with the discovery of new drugs for them (the disease has not yet been discovered , but the cure is already there.And so day by day science moves forward, and the life of the planet and man from this science is reduced). Just like, for example, in order to earn “a piece of bread and put the money earned on a settlement account abroad, first scientists (supposedly hackers) create computer viruses, and then every day the same scientists update anti-virus databases for the same purpose, showing a prompt response to modern computer evil. There are also other diseases not consciously bred by scientists, diseases of civilization - hemorrhoids, osteochondrosis, etc. from a sedentary lifestyle that requires modern technical progress or neurosis, and the modern chronic fatigue syndrome familiar to everyone (here again the factor of disturbing the rhythms of nature - sleep disturbances ). And our “close” ancestors did not have such an abundance of diseases as in the modern age of progress, and those diseases that were, were treated again with the help of the natural capabilities of our planet, our main living organism, our nurse. "Close" ancestors knew what grass or roots to cure this or that disease, they knew how to turn to the forces of nature for help. Modern progress has begun to call people who have retained such abilities of "close" ancestors, "healers", "shamans", in general, anti-scientific and uneducated people. But why, then, in those days of quackery, women, for example, did not lie endlessly in hospitals trying to get pregnant, bear and give birth to a child? Why, in the time of our “close” ancestors, did a woman continue to lead her usual way of life, without being distracted by pregnancy, and give birth where childbirth begins? Why now, in the age of medical progress, a pregnant woman automatically turns into a sick person who requires constant monitoring by doctors, special nutrition and mandatory treatment with at least vitamin preparations? Because the woman's body has changed? Or maybe because evolution has taken place, and the process of pregnancy and childbirth has changed? Or all the same, because those who came up with progress and medicines need funds for a comfortable life. For the process of giving birth to “close” ancestors, it was enough for a “midwife”, who could take the birth correctly and correct the baby in the truest sense of the word, straighten his still soft bones as it is necessary for him to be healthy. And in the current age of modern medicine, a child is not only tortured with drugs while he is in the womb, but also subjected to regular ultrasound and other examinations on modern medical devices and devices during pregnancy (otherwise, the inventions of these devices and drugs become scientists meaningless). But, despite such progress, during childbirth, most children are born with hematomas, oxygen deficiency and injuries received during childbirth in modern medical clinics, which, despite their “progressive” level, cannot gently straighten the bones and easily take birth like the old midwives. These modern clinics do not give the child and his mother what "close" ancestors gave - a feeling of home comfort and family energy. In the hospital, these two closest people (mother and child) are in state-owned conditions, isolated not only from their home, but often from their native country, when women in labor go to “great specialists” from other countries for help. Or scientists will say that "close" ancestors had a high mortality of infants and women in childbirth? Or maybe the birth rate was low? And if you look closely at modern statistics? How many babies die in the womb in each maternity hospital every year? How many mothers die in childbirth? And all this is attributed to the unhealthy body of women in labor, while missing the mistakes of doctors and the result of the "progress" of medicine. The same nature undisturbed by technical progress and natural products made it possible for most women to give birth both at home and in the field and without consequences. Now it's nonsense if a woman gives birth on the way to the hospital. Because they are accustomed to most often artificially adjust childbirth and under the supervision of modern “progressive” and “competent” doctors in order to extort funds for “food”. Mortality was many times lower in our "close" ancestors, and the birth rate was higher. The proof of this can only be the fact that there used to be families with many children, albeit poor, but healthy, friendly and happy, and now there are families with “little children” and “childless”, and living in constant strife even in the circle of their families. "Close" ancestors did not need medicines in the form in which modern scientists present us, they were able to use not only the unique properties of nature - herbs and roots, but also the unique properties of water. “Living” and “dead” water were not just plots for fairy tales, they were still not forgotten and not lost abilities to be able to use the possibilities of nature, in particular water. Huge mortality in the modern world with a high level of progress does not shock anyone, and the most common cause of death - cancer, tuberculosis, etc. have become as natural as natural death from old age (as in "close" ancestors). And what was the "distant" ancestors? No one knows for sure, but the absence of burials and cemeteries among the discovered remains of settlements of "ancient civilizations" of such a scale as in the modern world, I think, may indicate a developed level of natural medicine, and not various preparations planted by modern scientists. And again, to a level that was used by the ancient uneducated ancestors, to which our modern "progress" is still far away. Again, if we compare the Planet with the human body, then why does no one heal the Earth, why can it recover itself, but the human body allegedly does not? Modern scientists will still prove the progressiveness and usefulness of the drugs they create, as something without which a modern person cannot exist (and all this with one goal - to squeeze money out of a working person). But what about the placebo effect (a generally accepted fact when a patient is given a pacifier pill but he recovers from it as if he were given a real drug because the patient sincerely believes that he drank the medicine and not a pacifier)? A dummy effect that even cures cancer? It is not proof of the uselessness of medical progress? Does this mean that "close" and "distant" ancestors were able to use not drug treatment, but the possibilities of consciousness for health? And even now, given the number of counterfeit drugs, many of the patients receive treatment precisely due to this “placebo” effect, using ordinary chalk instead of drugs. So what is the progress of modern medicine? In the treatment of diseases invented during this progress, in the creation of "drug addiction" and "hospital addiction" in humanity, with the aim of profiting from patients and destroying humanity?
- modern education. The modern progress of education is obvious, in comparison with the education of our ancestors, not only scientists, but also all the townsfolk and housewives will say. Judging by the number of subjects taught in modern educational institutions and their complexity, then of course the science of “education” runs quickly and so far that no one can recognize and understand the words and terms used in science. And if we judge by the results of the training received? Do the educated reach the level of knowledge that their "distant" ancestors had? Judging by the fact that until now humanity has not been able to unravel the mysteries of previous civilizations, no, they do not. And if you compare with "close" ancestors? It would seem, yes, that modern educated humanity has outstripped them, but in what way? Can a modern graduate of an educational institution do what an uneducated “close” ancestor of that time could do? For example, to survive in the wild, know how to properly plant and harvest crops, find the necessary food in the forest, hunt, etc. without modern technical devices? Yes, modern educated people can do all this, but not in real, but in virtual reality, playing various simulation games on modern technical innovations. In other words, those practical skills that "close" ancestors possessed, modern humanity not only did not develop, but also lost what they had. And I suspect that they were lost and it was these same scientists who diligently destroyed them, and all for the sake of “moving progress forward”! What else does modern education provide for the life of mankind? An opportunity to become modern scientists to be proud of the fact that they are the ones who make progress "to nowhere"? But it is no secret to anyone that most of both student and scientific papers are often not written by the authors themselves, but someone does it for them for various reasons, while writing off each other for the same thing, then quoting themselves. And teachers require that students always use links and quotes in their work, and works without the use of “foreign words” are not accepted for offset. And what can such "educated" achieve, whose education is expressed only "on paper"? I affirm, and I think everyone will agree with me, that the modern education system (beginning with preschool and ending with higher modern educational institutions) was created only to tear people away from true knowledge, to destroy all the knowledge of their ancestors. Students, in order to master all the knowledge necessary for successful graduation from an educational institution, are forced to spend most of their free life time on learning, which they could spend on real research and knowledge of themselves and the world around them, to obtain true knowledge, and not imposed on us by the modern community scientists. But there is no time for humanity to do this, and it is not profitable for the inventors of more and more new drugs and technical devices, it is necessary to master what modern scientists have come up with and impose on us, calling the degradation of the population with the beautiful word “modern education”. Another proof of degradation can be the fact that modern "developed" humanity has lost the ability of both "close" and "distant" ancestors to receive all the necessary information and all the necessary information from space (or, as the publicist writes, the researcher of the energy-information state of space .And Kikilyk that humanity breathes memory and drinks memory, since one copy of the Planet's memory is laid in space, the second in water). Now those who have such skills are called psychics and are considered someone special, inaccessible to understanding. And before, every person was such a psychic, just as now everyone can become one. Only they do not teach this art in educational institutions, but rather take it away from it. For what? And so that modern humanity does not learn terrible secrets, but not the secrets of Nature, but the secrets of those who consciously and purposefully destroy the knowledge of their ancestors, the knowledge of Nature, created false sciences that contradict the laws of Nature. Those who hid from humanity the real alphabet that was used by the ancestors throughout the Planet, and the real language they spoke, and which kept the entire Planet and humanity in energy balance. Those who have removed many components from the concepts of physics, for example, the power of sound, without giving sounds and vibrations any role, while the vibrations emitted by both man himself and nature are the basis of everything. I do not even want and will not now remember some scientists who replaced the speed of thought with the speed of light, thus setting humanity on the wrong path of development of both science and life. This is modern educational progress? Take away true knowledge, take time to study it, and plant artificially created knowledge, making progress in this artificial knowledge?
So what has modern science achieved in recent centuries? Gave me what I didn't need. She herself came up with new viruses - she herself came up with medicines for them, she herself came up with weapons - she herself figured out how to defend against it, she herself came up with gadgets - and continues to think about how to improve them ... I.e. science is engaged in empty pastime - it artificially creates a “problem” and solves it itself, in other words, science is marking time, creating the illusion of achievements. And if it moves forward, it is not for the benefit of mankind, but in order to extract more profit (for example, they regularly come up with new gadgets). But in fact, modern science has not reached even a drop of what our ancestors, both “close” and “distant”, owned. Because someone deftly destroyed that knowledge and skills from the memory of the modern generation, replacing them with worthless modern ones. For what? Yes, in order to dominate, to turn us from free and independent people (as our ancestors were) into their slaves (as is happening now). We are absolutely dependent on all the results of "progress": amenities, medicines, telephony, the Internet, the pursuit of education for a more prestigious job, etc. All this makes us slaves of this "progress" and eternal buyers of regularly improved new products that become unusable after six months, a year, i.e. people who are constantly forced to work “for an uncle”, and then give what they earn to these same “uncles”, buying what is necessary for life in a modern progressive society, more precisely, for the profit of certain people who are behind modern “progress”. These are those “ghosts” invisible to us, who call themselves “priests” from the world council of priests, who rule the world, who own the knowledge of our ancestors, but skillfully took it away from us (See on the website www ..
They take our knowledge away from us, putting secrecy stamps on “discoveries” and making them inaccessible to ordinary people (whom they call their slaves), or declaring crazy those who still dare, without fear of persecution and “secret” clichés, declare publicly about true knowledge and real discoveries (not new discoveries, but discovered “old” and long forgotten ones). Yes, in principle, it is not required to declare crazy people who have true knowledge. Most people, having received a modern education and thanks to the very "scientific progress", consider this true information to be nonsense, and if they see evidence of this, in their opinion, nonsense, they consider them to be anomalous phenomena, since science cannot explain these phenomena, despite your "progress". Well, if the attempts of our "ghost rulers" do not work, then the "knowing" people are physically destroyed. Therefore, many people who have true knowledge are silent, afraid to show at least something that they only play the role of slaves in this world, in fact being the freest, because they have true knowledge that is absolutely not similar to modern generally accepted “scientific” knowledge. Some of the "knowledgeable" people still cannot keep it in themselves, and finding a compromise, breaks the silence, becoming a science fiction writer. And what claims to science fiction? You can’t call him crazy - he’s a writer, maybe he invented everything. You can’t put the “secret” stamp again, because these are just books and there seems to be nothing to destroy for revealing secrets, because nothing has been revealed. But the books of science fiction writers, as well as folk fairy tales for children, contain the truth hidden from us and make us think. “The tale is a lie, but there is a hint in it, a lesson for good fellows” - these words ended all folk (coming from “close” ancestors) fairy tales. These "ghosts"-rulers not only destroy the "secrets" themselves and people who have "secret" knowledge, they also hide fairy tales from us, filling the heads of modern children with new cartoons that do not carry information from the past. They take all scientific progress in a completely different direction, coming up with priority tasks for science, either finding cures for a modern virus, or inventing a new necessary weapon, or something else. Because if all the modern “secrets of past knowledge” are revealed, then the modern system of human life will be destroyed like a house of cards, and it will begin with the sciences taught in schools, as their falsity will be revealed.
And now, when I have shown all the senselessness of scientific progress and told about who is the culprit of our real ignorance of anything, I will reveal the secrets of correct knowledge without fear that I will be declared crazy. Since in each article devoted to a certain incredible - non-obvious, but vitally important, I will gradually clear the grains with true titles from scientific artificially inspired scientific husks, but this will absolutely not contradict modern scientific discoveries, and at the same time, each reader will understand that he is either knows, or heard about it once, or guessed, and will always agree with my words, and at the same time it will not be like the knowledge that “scientists” regularly present to us.
To be continued…
Ural, Chelyabinsk. January 2016
We live without understanding what scientists are hiding from us and those People who don't want us to know the truth. In fact, some things have long been known, but so far they have not yet been fully disclosed to society or disclosed, but not in an understandable form. Many people are simply too lazy to understand the secrets of life, and they prefer to be content with what they have and enjoy life.
But if you want to uncover all the secrets and mysteries of life, this article is for you. Psychologists and scientists have sorted out and learned what they are actually hiding from us and how to deal with the form of information that is presented to us today in an incomprehensible form. You can believe or not everything that is written in this article, but in order to protect your health, be free and happy, it is advisable for you to carefully read the studies of psychologists in this article.
Where did we come from and who created us
What scientists are hiding from us in a given question or even a problem. Indeed, today practically no one knows where we came from, who created the world and us in this world. There are many erroneous theories about the creation of the world and man. You yourself can find out about this if you think logically about what we are told about the creation of the world and people. Many will say that we are descended from animals, but if so, then where did the animals themselves, water, earth, air and the world as a whole come from. This theory is not true, because, having thought logically, every sane person would not believe in it. But those people who want us not to know the truth give us such information.
Also today, the popular answer to the question of the creation of the world is that God created us, in some countries, our own God, and he is called differently. In fact, people believe that God created us, similar to the image of a person, but no one has yet seen him and has not proven that this is exactly the case. In fact, this is not a completely correct theory of the creation of man and the world, since the Bible was written by wise people, and not by God, respectively, we read a smart book, but not everything is written in it truthfully. It is rather a fictional story, a fantasy that people came up with and decided to write the whole story in the Bible. The most correct theory that has been proven by scientists is energy.
Energy created the world, the universe and man
People who do not understand this call the energy God or the creator, in other countries this name changes, but the very essence remains. If you do not believe that we are created by energy, then go to any doctor and do a research on whether you have energy or not. Surprisingly, you will see for yourself that every person consists of energy, every animal, plant, water and earth is energy, the planet Earth on which we live is also energy. This theory was hidden from us for many years, but there were scientists who revealed the main secret to us and proved it. There are bad people who do not want us to know the truth and therefore, today there are many stories of the creation of the world. People are intimidated, and they become slaves of their own thoughts and believe in nonsense that comes from the wrong sources.
Our fears, insecurities and indecisions
There's something else from us hide some scientists people, this is the cause of our fears, insecurities and indecisions. We are born happy children, but over time, we have new fears, insecurities and worries. This is connected not only with the upbringing of parents, but also with society. Society, thanks to bad information, began to be afraid of everything, create stereotypes, lose faith in itself and in the meaning of life.
Bad people want society to always be in fear and not want to change anything and interfere in the lives of rulers and businessmen. It is up to you whether you want to take the outgoing bad information seriously and live in fear, or whether you want to build happiness by ignoring rumors and information. If you decide to become happy, protect yourself from such information, set a big goal and achieve it no matter what. Remember that we were not born to live in fear and be afraid of everything, we were born to live a happy life, to rejoice and have fun in every minute of our lives. Do not listen to anyone, think logically, independently, and soon you yourself will reveal some of the secrets of our world.
