What features of Lopakhin are attractive? “The Cherry Orchard”, Lopakhin: characteristics of the image

Lopakhin is a merchant and represents the person new era, which is to fill Russia and destroy the former classes. Landowners are replaced by capitalists, who in turn emerged from common people, but received significant opportunities.

In fact, the story is not new and Chekhov did not ironize the figure of the rich Lopakhin, who can communicate on equal terms with the people who actually owned his ancestors. Ermolai Alekseevich himself has a fairly high degree of accurate reflection and has no illusions about himself. He calls himself a simple man and this makes sense, just as his ancestors got up before dawn and went to bed at night and worked, he also works incessantly, just conditions have changed and now such people can make capital.

In essence, Lapakhin is an illustration of how a more or less decent person who is allowed to certain opportunities will behave. He behaves in many ways ruthlessly and does not have the refinement of nature, high ideals and sublimity of mind. At the same time, it is he who describes the cherry orchard reverently.

Although for Lopakhin such a description is simply beautiful words and a slight movement of the soul, he really just doesn’t feel deeply, he can’t understand deep feelings that its owners have for the garden. Yes, Lopakhin likes the garden, but he likes money more, and likes the opportunity to earn money and work in general. Therefore, he easily parts with the garden and even more so.

Chekhov skillfully presents some of the predatory, and, let’s say, “gluttonous” nature of Lopakhin, who, having achieved his goal (buying a garden), can no longer control himself. He dances around and even cuts down the garden before the owners leave - probably precisely to demonstrate his own power, in order to offend Ranevskaya, but mainly Gaev.

Of course, Ermolai is not a negative character in the literal sense, but if you look at it from the side of the landowners, he does not have any special inner dignity. Lopakhin knows about this and is not at all sad, because he can buy a garden, which the landowners cannot, who do not fall asleep over books, but are not particularly awake for this harsh and simple new world that Chekhov foresaw.

Essay about Lopakhin

A man, a man, Lopakhin says about himself. This image is collective and represents, to some extent, the ruler of modern times.

Lopakhin is truly the ruler of the coming era, he managed to make money thanks to new conditions. Such hardworking people become merchants and businessmen and amass capital. They belong to high society, but do not pretend to high culture and high ideals, they fall asleep over books, but work hard.

For Lopakhin, the cherry orchard (which, by the way, personifies Russia) does not carry within itself any symbolic ideal or shrine, it is only an advantageous space for making summer cottages and receive money for rent. Quite a short time after Chekhov wrote his play, men like Lopakhin will march en masse throughout the country, dividing up plots for summer residents, and in general, as they say, “selecting them and dividing them up.” Lopakhins do not really need comfort and grace high society, they are practical people.

Of course, this world needs people like Lopakhin, simple and active, but when they become the main driving force and replace the elite, then the country turns from a cherry orchard into vulgar areas for summer residents. Of course, Gaev’s happiness is also vulgar, his philistinism is no good, however, Lopakhin’s proletarian happiness does not look like a healthy alternative.

After all, what is happiness for Lopakhin? We see at the end of the play, when he loses control, begins to dance and does not even allow Ranevskaya and the others to leave the estate calmly, he begins to cut down the garden in front of the former owners, in order, as they say, to rub his nose in. Previously, Lopakhin's ancestors worked in this garden for their owners, but now he is the king of the world, who has achieved everything with his hump.

Yes, Lopakhin is hardworking, but, in essence, he achieves everything only through brute force. More or less normal upbringing and he received some moral principles precisely thanks to the landowners and the Ranevskaya family in particular. By the way, with representatives of the upper class he continues to behave politely and restrains himself, although as soon as he gets what he is looking for, his old manners disappear and Lopakhin becomes a simple and rude predator who sees only practical side existence.

Of course, Chekhov does not see Lopakhin as a negative figure; he probably sees in him the natural course of the world, just as the seasons replace each other, so when the landowners become pampered Gaevs, the more practical and stern Lopakhins come to replace them. This is a change of eras, which Chekhov accurately saw and characterized in his own creation.

Option 3

At the center of the play is A.P. Chekhov " Cherry Orchard» - sale of launched noble estate. Owners, formerly rich noble family, - unbusinesslike people, not adapted to new living conditions. The representative of the new social force that replaced the nobility at the beginning of the 20th century - the bourgeoisie - is one of the heroes of the play - the merchant Lopakhin.

Lopakhin Ermolai Alekseevich is the grandson and son of serfs, an honest, hardworking, energetic person. The bulk of his fortune was earned by his own labor. He is illiterate and has never studied anywhere. But he has business acumen, mind. Lopakhin is completely absorbed in some task, he always lacks time, he is constantly on the road. He cannot live without work. He is the only one among the characters in the play who constantly looks at his watch and is interested in time. Lopakhin does not regret lending money to Ranevskaya and Simeonov-Pishchik, and offers it to Petya Trofimov. He is a reasonable, but kind, decent person.

Lopakhin is not at all an enemy of the nobles Ranevskaya and Gaev. On the contrary, he feels sympathy for them and really wants to help. Lopakhin does not want to destroy the cherry orchard, but gives practical advice: divide the garden into plots for summer cottages and rent them out for a reasonable fee. But for them, noble intellectuals, this sounds like an insult. The Cherry Orchard for them is the personification of the noble past. Lopakhin cannot understand why all his impulses to help do not find a response. He is for them - last chance. He is annoyed by their delay. For him, a garden is an object of purchase and sale, a profitable investment of capital.

Lopakhin is not given personal happiness. His relationship with Varya is complicated. She wants to marry Lopakhin, seeing him as a suitable match. But he hesitates to propose to her, although he understands that this is expected of him. He doesn't love her, he's bored with her. Lopakhin has warm feelings for Ranevskaya. He remembers how kind she was to him, protecting him from his father’s beatings as a child. He lends her money and wants to help. But Lyubov Andreevna does not take Lopakhin’s feelings seriously.

As a result, it is Lopakhin who turns out to be the owner of the garden. He is both happy and embarrassed at the same time. He is the owner of an estate in which his grandfather and father were serfs. The acquisition of an estate is evidence of it success in life, self-affirmation. He is shocked by Ranevskaya's tears. In Lopakhin’s last desperate words, which he addresses to her, one senses an understanding of the impossibility of living the way one wants.

Lopakhin, it is true, is a merchant, but a decent one

human in every sense.

A. Chekhov. From letters

The play “The Cherry Orchard” was written by Chekhov in 1903, when great social changes were brewing in Russia. The nobility was collapsing, arose new class- the bourgeoisie, whose representative in the play is Ermolai Lopakhin.

Chekhov persistently emphasized the significance and complexity of this image: “... Lopakhin’s role is central. If it fails, then the whole play will fail.”

Lopakhin became the new owner of the cherry orchard; he is a symbol of the real Russia. What is it, is it real?

Lopakhin’s father was a “man” - “he traded in a shop in the village.” And Ermolai says about himself: “He’s just rich, he has a lot of money, but if you think about it and figure it out, he’s a man.”

This hero apparently inherited his love of work from his ancestors, and achieved everything in life on his own. His capital is not inherited, but earned. Active and active, Lopakhin was accustomed to relying on his own strength in everything. He really has a “subtle, gentle soul”, he knows how to feel beauty: he is sincerely admired by the garden, “there is nothing more beautiful in the world”, a blooming poppy field. And at the same time, his delight at the profitable sale of poppies is quite understandable.

Lopakhin cannot be considered a villain who snuck into a noble family with evil intent. In fact, he is deeply decent and sincerely attached to Ranevskaya, who once did a lot of kindness for him: “... You, in fact, you once did so much for me that I... love you like dear... more than his own..." That is why he wants to save Ranevskaya and Gaev from ruin, tries to teach them, calls them to action and, seeing how weak-willed these people are, unable to solve even minor everyday problems, sometimes he comes into despair.

Like Ranevskaya, Lopakhin is attached to this house and garden, but this attachment is of a completely different nature than memories of all the good things in life. Lopa-khin's father and grandfather were serfs in a house where "they weren't even allowed into the kitchen." Having become the owner of the estate, Ermolai is proud and happy, he wants his ancestors to be happy for him because “their Ermolai, the beaten, illiterate Ermolai, who ran barefoot in the winter,” managed to advance in life. Material from the site

Lopakhin dreams that “our awkward, unhappy life will somehow change,” and is ready to completely destroy the terrible memory of the past. But in this case, his businesslike behavior eradicates the spirituality in him, and he himself understands this: he cannot read books - he falls asleep, he does not know how to deal with his love. Saving the cherry orchard, he cuts it down to rent out the land to summer residents, and the beauty dies in his hands. He doesn't even have the tact to wait until he leaves former owners.

It is clear from everything that Lopakhin feels like the master of life, but the author is clearly not on the side of the man who mercilessly chops down the trunks of beautiful trees with an ax.

It seems to me that the image of Lopakhin is ambiguous; he cannot be called either exclusively a “beast of prey” or only the owner of a “subtle, gentle soul.” These character qualities are combined in him, conditioned by a difficult transition period V public life Russia. But the contradictions of Lopakhin’s image precisely constitute the interest and drama of a new type of people - the masters of Russia in Chekhov’s present.

Didn't find what you were looking for? Use the search

On this page there is material on the following topics:

characteristics of Lopakhin with quotes
Lopatin a subtle gentle soul or a predatory beast based on the play The Cherry Orchard
Petya Trofimov says that he loves Lopakhin, believes that he has a subtle and gentle soul, and at the same time sees him as a predatory beast. how to understand this?
cherry orchard characteristics Lopakhin gentle soul
Who is this Ermolai Lopakhin?

LOPAKHIN

LOPAKHIN is the hero of A.P. Chekhov’s comedy “The Cherry Orchard” (1903).

Unlike other characters in the comedy, whose “perspective of feelings” goes into the past (Ranevskaya, Gaev, Firs) or into the future (Trofimov, Anya), L. is entirely in the “present,” transitional, unstable time, open in both directions “ temporary chains" (Chekhov). “Boor,” Gaev unequivocally certifies him. According to Trofimov, L. has a “subtle, gentle soul” and “fingers like an artist.” Both are right. And in this correctness of both is the “psychological paradox” of the image of L.

“A man like a man” - despite the watch, the “white vest” and “yellow boots”, despite all his wealth - L. works like a man: he gets up “at five o’clock in the morning” and works “from morning to evening.” He is in constant business fever: “we have to hurry,” “it’s time,” “time doesn’t wait,” “there’s no time to talk.” In the last act, after purchasing the cherry orchard, his business excitement turns into some kind of nervous business fever. He is no longer only in a hurry, but also in a hurry to others: “Hurry up,” “It’s time to go,” “Come out, gentlemen...”.

L.’s past (“My dad was a man, an idiot, he didn’t understand anything, he didn’t teach me, he just beat me when he was drunk, and that was all with a stick”) has grown into the present and echoes in it: with stupid words (“Okhmelia...”, “to date"); inappropriate jokes; “bad handwriting”, because of which “people are ashamed”; falling asleep over a book in which “I didn’t understand anything”; shaking hands with a footman, etc.

L. willingly lends money, being in this sense an “atypical” merchant. He “simply”, from the heart, offers them to Petya Trofimov on the road. He sincerely cares about the Gaevs, offering them a “project” to save them from ruin: to divide the cherry orchard and the land along the river into summer cottages and then rent them out as summer cottages. But it is precisely at this point that the unsolvable dramatic conflict: in the relationship between the “rescuer” L. and the “rescued” owners of the estate.

The conflict is not about class antagonism, economic interests or hostile personalities. The conflict is located in a completely different area: in the subtle, almost indistinguishable sphere of the “culture of feelings.” In the scene of Ranevskaya’s arrival, L. sees her bright joy when meeting with home, childhood, past; observes Gaev’s emotion and Firs’ excitement. But he is unable to share this joy, this excitement, this “chillness” of feelings and moods - he is unable to sympathize. He would like to say “something very pleasant, cheerful,” but he is overwhelmed by a different joy and a different excitement: he knows how he can save them from ruin. He is in a hurry to make his “project” public and comes across Gaev’s indignant “Nonsense” and Ranevskaya’s embarrassed words: “My dear, I’m sorry, you don’t understand anything.” Saying the words about the need to “clean up” here, “clean”, “demolish”, “cut down”, he does not even understand what an emotional shock this plunges the owners of the family estate with which their whole life is connected. This line turns out to be impassable for either side of the dramatic conflict.

The more actively L. seeks consent to demolish the old house and cut down the cherry orchard, the deeper the abyss of misunderstanding becomes. As the action progresses, the emotional tension of this confrontation also grows, at one pole of which is Lopakhin’s “I will either burst into tears, or scream, or faint. I can't! You tortured me!” - and on the other is Ranevskaya’s feeling: “If you really need to sell, then sell me along with the garden.” L. cannot understand that for Ranevskaya a simple “yes” means complete self-destruction and self-destruction of the individual. For him, this question is “completely empty.”

The poverty of the emotional “spectrum”, mental “color blindness”, deafness to distinguishing shades of feelings make it impossible for L. to have close, heartfelt contact with Ranevskaya, whom he “loves like his own, more than his own.” In L. there is growing some kind of vague consciousness of his deprivation, a heavy bewilderment in front of life. He strives not to give free rein to these thoughts and “clogs” them with hard work: “When I work for a long time, tirelessly, then the thoughts are easier, and it seems as if I also know why I exist.” In hours of insomnia, he is capable of large-scale generalizations: “Lord, you gave us huge forests, vast fields, the deepest horizons, and living here, we ourselves should truly be giants.” But in life this leads to “waving his arms” and Ranevskaya’s aloof remark: “You needed giants... They are only good in fairy tales, they frighten attacks.” in the world noble culture L.'s rough harshness and definiteness of feelings are inappropriate. Indifferent to the beauty and poetry of the cherry orchard, L. has his own ideas about beauty: “I sowed a thousand dessiatines of poppy seeds in the spring and now I have earned forty thousand net. And when my poppy bloomed, what a picture it was!”

With the greatest openness, sad inner strength L. broke through in the scene of returning from the auction. The drunken courage of the monologue - with the stomping of feet, with laughter and tears - expressed the “subtle and gentle” soul of the “boor”. Let it be “somehow by accident” (K.S. Stanislavsky), “almost involuntarily”, “unexpectedly for himself”, but he still bought Ranevskaya’s estate. He did everything to save the owners of the cherry orchard, but did not have sincere tact don't chop it down in front of your eyes former owners: I was in a hurry to clear the “past” from the site for the “future.”

The first performer of the role of L. was L.M. Leonidov (1904). Other performers include B.G. Dobronravov (1934), V.S. Vysotsky (1975).

N.A. Shalimova

Literary heroes. - Academician. 2009 .

See what "LOPAKHIN" is in other dictionaries:

Lopakhin- Lop ahin, and (lit. character; businessman) ... Russian spelling dictionary

Corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (1988); born February 11, 1941; works in Russian center examination of drugs by the Russian Ministry of Health and Medical Industry; direction scientific activity: pharmacology… Large biographical encyclopedia

The Cherry Orchard Genre: lyrical tragicomedy

The Cherry Orchard The Cherry Orchard Genre: Comedy

This term has other meanings, see They fought for their homeland. They fought for their homeland... Wikipedia

- (1938 1980), Russian poet, actor, author and performer of songs. Tragically confessional poems, romantic lyrical, comic and satirical songs, ballads (collections: “Nerve”, 1981; “I, of course, will return...”, 1988). In songwriting... ... Encyclopedic Dictionary

Introduction

“...if it (the role) fails, then the whole play will fail.” So in one of his letters Chekhov spoke about the role of Lopakhin from the play “The Cherry Orchard”. Oddly enough, the author places the center of attention not on Ranevskaya, the owner of the cherry orchard, but on Lopakhin. Merchant, that's enough limited person, himself honestly admitting that he is essentially “a blockhead and an idiot” - this is the characterization of Lopakhin from “The Cherry Orchard” that is first remembered by readers. And yet it is precisely him who the author calls the “central” figure in the work! A number of critics echo him, defining this hero as a hero of new times, a viable person “ new formation", with a sober and clear view of things. To better understand this contradictory image, let's carry out Lopakhin's analysis.

Life path of Lopakhin

The fate of Lopakhin, Ermolai Alekseevich from the very beginning is closely intertwined with the fate of the Ranevskaya family. His father was a serf to Ranevskaya’s father, and traded “in a shop in the village.” One day, Lopakhin recalls in the first act, his father drank and broke his face. Then young Ranevskaya took him to her place, washed him and consoled him: “Don’t cry, little man, he’ll heal before the wedding.” Lopakhin still remembers these words, and they resonate in him in two ways. On the one hand, he is pleased by Ranevskaya’s affection, on the other, the word “peasant” hurts his pride. It was his father who was a man, Lopakhin protests, and he himself “made it into the people” and became a merchant. He has a lot of money, “a white vest and yellow shoes” - and he achieved all this himself. His parents didn’t teach him anything, his father only beat him when he was drunk. Remembering this, the hero admits that, in essence, he remained a peasant: his handwriting is bad, and he doesn’t understand anything about books - “he read a book and fell asleep.”

Lopakhin's energy and hard work deserves undoubted respect. From five o'clock he is already on his feet, works from morning to evening and cannot imagine his life without work. An interesting detail is that due to his activities, he always lacks time; some business trips on which he goes are constantly mentioned. This character in the play looks at his watch more often than others. In contrast to the amazingly impractical Ranevskaya family, he knows the score of both time and money.

At the same time, Lopakhin cannot be called a money-grubber or an unprincipled “merchant grabber,” like those merchants whose images Ostrovsky loved to paint. This can be evidenced at least by the ease with which he parted with his money. During the course of the play, Lopakhin will lend or offer money more than once (remember the dialogue with Petya Trofimov and the eternal debtor Simeonov-Pishchik). And most importantly, Lopakhin is sincerely worried about the fate of Ranevskaya and her estate. The merchants from Ostrovsky's plays would never do what comes to Lopakhin's mind - he himself offers Ranevskaya a way out of the situation. But the profit that can be made by renting out a cherry orchard for summer cottages is not small at all (Lopakhin calculates it himself).

And it would be much more profitable to wait until the day of the auction and secretly buy a profitable estate. But no, the hero is not like that, he will more than once invite Ranevskaya to think about her fate. Lopakhin is not trying to buy a cherry orchard. “I teach you every day,” he says to Ranevskaya in despair shortly before the auction. And it’s not his fault that in response he will hear the following: dachas are “so vulgar”, Ranevskaya will never agree to this. But let him, Lopakhin, not leave, it’s “still more fun” with him...

Characteristics of Lopakhin through the eyes of other characters

So, before us appears an extraordinary character, in which business acumen and practical intelligence are combined with sincere affection for the Ranevsky family, and this attachment, in turn, contradicts his desire to profit from their estate. To get a more accurate idea of the image of Lopakhin in Chekhov’s play “The Cherry Orchard,” let’s look at how the other characters speak about him. The range of these reviews will be wide - from “the enormous mind of a person” (Simeonov-Pishchik) to “a predatory beast that eats everything in its path” (Petya).

Bright negative characteristic belongs to Ranevskaya’s brother, Gaev: “boorish, fist.” Lopakhin is somewhat beautified in Gaev’s eyes by the fact that he is “Varin’s fiancé,” and yet this does not prevent Gaev from considering the merchant a limited person. However, let's see from whose lips such a description of Lopakhin sounds in the play? Lopakhin himself repeats it, and repeats it without malice: “Let him speak.” For him, according to him in my own words, the only thing that is important is that Ranevskaya’s “amazing, touching eyes” look at him “as before.”

Ranevskaya herself treats Lopakhin with warmth. For her he is “good, interesting person" And yet, from every phrase of Ranevskaya it is clear that she and Lopakhin are people different circles. Lopakhin sees in Ranevskaya something more than just an old acquaintance...

Test of love

Throughout the play, every now and then there is a conversation about the marriage of Lopakhin and Varya, this is spoken of as a matter already decided. In response to Ranevskaya’s direct proposal to take Varya as his wife, the hero replies: “I’m not averse... She good girl" And yet the wedding never takes place. But why?

Of course, this can be explained by the practicality of Lopakhin the merchant, who does not want to take a dowry for himself. In addition, Varya has certain rights to the cherry orchard, and her soul cares for it. Cutting down the garden comes between them. Varya explains her failure in love even more simply: in her opinion, Lopakhin simply does not have time for feelings, he is a businessman incapable of love. On the other hand, Varya herself does not suit Lopakhin. Her world is limited by housework, she is dry and “looks like a nun.” Lopakhin more than once demonstrates the breadth of his soul (let us remember his statement about the giants who are so lacking in Rus'). From Varya’s incoherent dialogues with Lopakhin, it becomes clear: they absolutely do not understand each other. And Lopakhin, deciding for himself Hamlet’s question “To be or not to be?”, acts honestly. Realizing that he will not find happiness with Varya, he, like the district Hamlet, says: “Okhmelia, go to the monastery”...

The point, however, is not only the incompatibility of Lopakhin and Varya, but the fact that the hero has another, unexpressed love. This is Lyubov Andreevna Ranevskaya, whom he loves “more than his own.” Throughout the entire play, Lopakhin’s bright, reverent attitude towards Ranevskaya runs as the leitmotif. He decides to propose to Varya after a request from Ranevskaya, but here he cannot overcome himself.

Lopakhin’s tragedy lies in the fact that for Ranevskaya he remained the same little man whom she once carefully washed. And at that moment when he finally understands that the “dear” that he kept in his soul will not be understood, a turning point occurs. All the heroes of “The Cherry Orchard” lose something of their own, cherished – Lopakhin is no exception. Only in the image of Lopakhin does his feeling for Ranevskaya appear as a cherry orchard.

Lopakhin's celebration

And then it happened - Lopakhin acquired Ranevskaya’s estate at auction. Lopakhin – new owner cherry orchard! Now a predatory element really emerges in his character: “I can pay for everything!” The understanding that he bought an estate where he once, “poor and illiterate,” did not dare to go beyond the kitchen, intoxicates him. But in his voice one can hear irony, self-mockery. Apparently, Lopakhin already understands that his triumph will not last long - he can buy a cherry orchard, “there is nothing more beautiful in the world,” but buying a dream is not in his power, it will vanish like smoke. Ranevskaya can still be consoled, because she is, after all, leaving for Paris. And Lopakhin remains alone, understanding this very well. “Goodbye” is all he can say to Ranevskaya, and this absurd word raises Lopakhin to the level of a tragic hero.

Work test

Lopakhin Ermolai Alekseevich is a rich merchant, coming from ordinary peasants (his father was a serf). Lopakhin's father became free after the abolition of serfdom (1861). Having some money, he opened a shop and became rich. Ermolai energetically took up his father’s business and significantly increased his wealth. Despite his condition, Lopakhin remained a simple man (he liked to emphasize this).

Lopakhin has a calculating mind, business acumen and enterprise. He is energetic, and the scope of his activities is much wider than that of the previous masters of life.

From five o'clock he is already on his feet, works from morning to evening and cannot imagine his life without work. An interesting detail is that due to his activities, he always lacks time; some business trips on which he goes are constantly mentioned. This character in the play looks at his watch more often than others. In contrast to the amazingly impractical Ranevskaya family, he knows the score of both time and money.

Lopakhin loves Ranevskaya and keeps warm memories of her. In a conversation with Dunyasha he says:

“I remember when I was a boy of about fifteen, my late father - he was selling in a shop here in the village back then - hit me in the face with his fist, blood started coming out of my nose... Lyubov Andreevna, as I remember now, was still young, so thin, let me down me to the washstand, in this very room, in the nursery. “Don’t cry, he says, little man, he’ll heal before the wedding...”

Garden Rescue Plan

Having learned about her misfortune (the cherry orchard does not generate income and Ranevskaya is forced to put it up for sale in order to pay off her debts), Lopakhin proposes a rescue plan. Like a true entrepreneur, he finds a way to make the garden profitable. To do this, you need to divide the garden into plots and rent them out as summer cottages. True, the cherry tree itself will have to be cut down.

Lopakhin, being a practical and a little down-to-earth person, does not understand the nostalgic feelings that Ranevskaya feels for the garden. When she does not agree to do this with their dear garden, Lopakhin is surprised at the frivolity and idleness of Ranevskaya and her brother. He himself gets up at 5 am and works until night.

Lopakhin's celebration

At the end of the play, it is Lopakhin who acquires the cherry orchard. This is the moment of his highest triumph: the peasant’s son, “the illiterate Ermolai,” becomes the owner of a noble estate, where his “father and grandfather were slaves.” He no longer thinks about the feelings of the former owners of the estate. Joy bursts out of Lopakhin, he laughs and stamps his feet. His feelings are expressed in a monologue:

“If my father and grandfather stood up from their graves and looked at the whole incident, how Ermolai bought their estate, the most beautiful of which there is nothing in the world. I bought an estate where my grandfather and father were slaves, where they were not even allowed into the kitchen...”

Having become the owner of the Ranevskaya estate, the new owner dreams of a new life: “Hey, musicians, play, I want to listen to you! Come and watch how Ermolai Lopakhin takes an ax to the cherry orchard and how the trees fall to the ground! We will set up the dachas, and our grandchildren and great-grandchildren will see new life...Music, play!”

The “new master” of life, Lopakhin, personifies the new time. He is the only one who can come closer to understanding the essence of the era, but there is no place in his life real beauty, sincerity, humanity, because Lopakhin is a symbol only of the present. The future belongs to other people

Quotes from Lopakhin

My father, it’s true, was a man, but here I am in a white vest and yellow shoes.

Your brother, Leonid Andreevich, says about me that I’m a boor, I’m a kulak, but that doesn’t really matter to me. Let him talk. I only wish that you would still believe me, that your amazing, touching eyes would look at me as before. Merciful God! My father was a serf to your grandfather and father, but you, in fact, you once did so much for me that I forgot everything and love you like my own... more than my own.

You are very gentle, Dunyasha. And you dress like a young lady, and so does your hair. This is not possible. We must remember ourselves.

Yes, time is ticking.

I always have my own and other people’s money, and I see what kind of people are around me. You just need to start doing something to understand how few honest, decent people there are.

The only remarkable thing about this garden is that it is very large. Cherries are born once every two years, and there’s nowhere to put them, no one buys them.

In the spring I sowed a thousand dessiatines of poppy seeds and now I have earned forty thousand net. And when my poppy bloomed, what a picture it was! So, I say, I earned forty thousand and, therefore, I offer you a loan, because I can. Why rub your nose? I'm a man... simply.

My dad was a man, an idiot, he didn’t understand anything, he didn’t teach me, he just beat me when he was drunk, and that was all with a stick. In essence, I’m just as much of a blockhead and an idiot. I haven’t studied anything, my handwriting is bad, I write in such a way that people are ashamed of me, like a pig.