A detailed analysis of the story "Matryona Dvor" by Solzhenitsyn. Analysis of Solzhenitsyn's story "Matryona's yard" Solzhenitsyn's "Matryona's yard" brief analysis

The history of the creation of Solzhenitsyn's work "Matryonin Dvor"

In 1962, the Novy Mir magazine published the story One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, which made Solzhenitsyn's name known throughout the country and far beyond its borders. A year later, in the same journal, Solzhenitsyn published several stories, including “Matryona Dvor”. Postings have stopped at this point. None of the writer's works were allowed to be published in the USSR. And in 1970 Solzhenitsyn was awarded the Nobel Prize.
Initially, the story "Matryona Dvor" was called "A village does not stand without the righteous." But, on the advice of A. Tvardovsky, in order to avoid censorship obstacles, the name was changed. For the same reasons, the year of action in the story from 1956 was replaced by the author with 1953. "Matrenin Dvor", as the author himself noted, "is completely autobiographical and reliable." In all the notes to the story, the prototype of the heroine is reported - Matryona Vasilievna Zakharova from the village of Miltsovo, Kurlovsky district, Vladimir region. The narrator, like the author himself, teaches in the Ryazan village, living with the heroine of the story, and the narrator's patronymic - Ignatich - is consonant with A. Solzhenitsyn's patronymic - Isaevich. The story, written in 1956, tells about the life of a Russian village in the fifties.
Critics praised the story. The essence of Solzhenitsyn's work was noted by A. Tvardovsky: “Why is the fate of the old peasant woman, told on a few pages, of such great interest to us? This woman is unread, illiterate, a simple worker. And yet her spiritual world is endowed with such qualities that we talk with her as with Anna Karenina. After reading these words in Literaturnaya Gazeta, Solzhenitsyn immediately wrote to Tvardovsky: “Needless to say, the paragraph of your speech referring to Matryona means a lot to me. You pointed to the very essence - to a woman who loves and suffers, while all the criticism scoured all the time from above, comparing the Talnovsky collective farm and neighboring ones.
The first title of the story “A village is not worth without the righteous” contained a deep meaning: the Russian village rests on people whose lifestyle is based on the universal values ​​of kindness, labor, sympathy, and help. Since a righteous person is called, firstly, a person who lives in accordance with religious rules; secondly, a person who does not sin in any way against the rules of morality (the rules that determine the mores, behavior, spiritual and spiritual qualities necessary for a person in society). The second name - "Matryona Dvor" - somewhat changed the angle of view: moral principles began to have clear boundaries only within the Matrenin Dvor. On a larger scale of the village, they are blurred, the people around the heroine are often different from her. Having titled the story "Matryona's Dvor", Solzhenitsyn focused the readers' attention on the wonderful world of the Russian woman.

Genus, genre, creative method of the analyzed work

Solzhenitsyn once remarked that he rarely turned to the short story genre, for “artistic pleasure”: “You can put a lot in a small form, and it is a great pleasure for an artist to work on a small form. Because in a small form you can hone the edges with great pleasure for yourself. In the story "Matryona Dvor" all facets are honed with brilliance, and meeting with the story becomes, in turn, a great pleasure for the reader. The story is usually based on a case that reveals the character of the protagonist.
Regarding the story "Matryona Dvor" in literary criticism, there were two points of view. One of them presented Solzhenitsyn's story as a phenomenon of "village prose". V. Astafiev, calling "Matryona Dvor" "the pinnacle of Russian short stories", believed that our "village prose" came out of this story. Somewhat later, this idea was developed in literary criticism.
At the same time, the story "Matryona Dvor" was associated with the original genre of "monumental story" that was formed in the second half of the 1950s. An example of this genre is M. Sholokhov's story "The Fate of a Man".
In the 1960s, the genre features of the “monumental story” were recognizable in A. Solzhenitsyn’s Matrenin Dvor, V. Zakrutkin’s The Human Mother, and E. Kazakevich’s In the Light of Day. The main difference of this genre is the image of a simple person who is the custodian of universal human values. Moreover, the image of a simple person is given in sublime colors, and the story itself is focused on a high genre. So, in the story "The Fate of a Man" features of the epic are visible. And in the "Matryona Dvor" the emphasis is on the lives of the saints. Before us is the life of Matrena Vasilievna Grigorieva, the righteous and great martyr of the era of "solid collectivization" and the tragic experiment on the whole country. Matryona was portrayed by the author as a saint ("Only she had fewer sins than a rickety cat").

The subject of the work

The theme of the story is a description of the life of the patriarchal Russian village, which reflects how flourishing egoism and rapacity disfigure Russia and "destroy communications and meaning." The writer raises in a short story the serious problems of the Russian village of the early 50s. (her life, customs and mores, the relationship between power and a working person). The author repeatedly emphasizes that the state needs only working hands, and not the person himself: “She was lonely all around, but since she began to get sick, she was released from the collective farm.” A person, according to the author, should mind his own business. So Matryona finds the meaning of life in work, she is angry with the unscrupulous attitude of others to business.

An analysis of the work shows that the problems raised in it are subordinated to one goal: to reveal the beauty of the Christian Orthodox worldview of the heroine. On the example of the fate of a village woman, to show that life's losses and suffering only more clearly show the measure of the human in each of the people. But Matryona dies - and this world collapses: her house is pulled apart by a log, her modest belongings are greedily divided. And there is no one to protect Matryona's yard, no one even thinks that with the departure of Matryona, something very valuable and important, not amenable to division and primitive everyday assessment, passes away. “We all lived next to her and did not understand that she is the same righteous man, without whom, according to the proverb, the village does not stand. No city. Not all our land." The last phrases expand the boundaries of the Matrona Court (as the personal world of the heroine) to the scale of humanity.

The main characters of the work

The main character of the story, as indicated in the title, is Matrena Vasilievna Grigorieva. Matrena is a lonely destitute peasant woman with a generous and disinterested soul. She lost her husband in the war, buried six of her own and raised other people's children. Matryona gave her pupil the most precious thing in her life - the house: "... she did not feel sorry for the upper room, which stood idle, as well as neither her labor nor her goodness ...".
The heroine has endured many hardships in life, but has not lost the ability to empathize with others, joy and sorrow. She is disinterested: she sincerely rejoices in someone else's good harvest, although she never has it on the sand herself. All the wealth of Matrena is a dirty white goat, a lame cat and large flowers in tubs.
Matryona is a concentration of the best features of the national character: she is shy, understands the "education" of the narrator, respects him for it. The author appreciates in Matryona her delicacy, the absence of annoying curiosity about the life of another person, hard work. For a quarter of a century she worked on a collective farm, but because she was not at a factory, she was not entitled to a pension for herself, and she could only get it for her husband, that is, for the breadwinner. As a result, she never received a pension. Life was extremely difficult. She got grass for a goat, peat for warmth, collected old stumps turned out by a tractor, soaked lingonberries for the winter, grew potatoes, helping those who were nearby to survive.
Analysis of the work says that the image of Matryona and individual details in the story are symbolic. Solzhenitsyn's Matryona is the embodiment of the ideal of a Russian woman. As noted in critical literature, the appearance of the heroine is like an icon, and life is like the lives of saints. Her house, as it were, symbolizes the ark of the biblical Noah, in which he escapes from the global flood. The death of Matryona symbolizes the cruelty and meaninglessness of the world in which she lived.
The heroine lives according to the laws of Christianity, although her actions are not always clear to others. Therefore, the attitude towards it is different. Matryona is surrounded by sisters, sister-in-law, adopted daughter Kira, the only friend in the village, Thaddeus. However, no one appreciated it. She lived in poverty, wretchedly, lonely - a "lost old woman", exhausted by work and illness. Relatives almost did not appear in her house, everyone condemned Matryona in chorus that she was funny and stupid, she worked for others for free all her life. Everyone mercilessly took advantage of Matryona's kindness and innocence - and unanimously judged her for it. Among the people around her, the author treats her heroine with great sympathy; both her son Thaddeus and her pupil Kira love her.
The image of Matryona is contrasted in the story with the image of the cruel and greedy Thaddeus, who seeks to get Matryona's house during her lifetime.
Matryona's courtyard is one of the key images of the story. The description of the courtyard, the house is detailed, with a lot of details, devoid of bright colors. Matryona lives "in the wilderness." It is important for the author to emphasize the inseparability of the house and the person: if the house is destroyed, its mistress will also die. This unity is already stated in the very title of the story. The hut for Matryona is filled with a special spirit and light, the life of a woman is connected with the "life" of the house. Therefore, for a long time she did not agree to break the hut.

Plot and composition

The story consists of three parts. In the first part, we are talking about how fate threw the hero-narrator to the station with a strange name for Russian places - Peat product. A former prisoner, now a school teacher, longing to find peace in some remote and quiet corner of Russia, finds shelter and warmth in the house of an elderly and familiar life Matrena. “Maybe, to someone from the village, who is richer, Matryona’s hut didn’t seem well-lived, but we were quite good with her that autumn and winter: it didn’t leak from the rains and the cold winds blew the stove heat out of it not immediately, only in the morning , especially when the wind was blowing from the leaky side. In addition to Matryona and me, they also lived in the hut - a cat, mice and cockroaches. They immediately find a common language. Next to Matryona, the hero calms down with his soul.
In the second part of the story, Matrena recalls her youth, the terrible ordeal that befell her. Her fiancé Thaddeus went missing in World War I. The younger brother of her missing husband, Yefim, who was left alone after death with the younger children in his arms, asked her to woo her. She took pity on Matryona Efim, married an unloved one. And here, after three years of absence, Thaddeus himself unexpectedly returned, whom Matryona continued to love. The hard life did not harden Matrena's heart. In worries about daily bread, she went her way to the end. And even death overtook a woman in labor worries. Matryona dies helping Thaddeus and his sons to drag part of their own hut bequeathed to Kira across the railroad on a sleigh. Thaddeus did not want to wait for the death of Matryona and decided to take the inheritance for the young during her lifetime. Thus, he unwittingly provoked her death.
In the third part, the tenant learns about the death of the mistress of the house. The description of the funeral and commemoration showed the true attitude of people close to her towards Matryona. When relatives bury Matryona, they cry more out of duty than from the heart, and think only about the final division of Matryona's property. And Thaddeus doesn't even come to the wake.

Artistic features of the analyzed story

The artistic world in the story is built linearly - in accordance with the life story of the heroine. In the first part of the work, the whole story about Matryona is given through the perception of the author, a man who has endured a lot in his lifetime, who dreamed of "getting lost and getting lost in the very interior of Russia." The narrator evaluates her life from the outside, compares it with the environment, becomes an authoritative witness of righteousness. In the second part, the heroine talks about herself. The combination of lyrical and epic pages, the chaining of episodes according to the principle of emotional contrast allows the author to change the rhythm of the narration, its tone. In this way, the author goes to recreate a multi-layered picture of life. Already the first pages of the story serve as a convincing example. It is opened by the beginning, which tells about the tragedy at the railway siding. We learn the details of this tragedy at the end of the story.
Solzhenitsyn in his work does not give a detailed, specific description of the heroine. Only one portrait detail is constantly emphasized by the author - Matryona's "radiant", "kind", "apologising" smile. Nevertheless, by the end of the story, the reader imagines the appearance of the heroine. Already in the very tonality of the phrase, the selection of “colors”, one can feel the author’s attitude towards Matryona: “From the red frosty sun, the frozen window of the canopy, now shortened, flooded a little pink, and Matryona’s face warmed this reflection.” And then - a direct author's description: "Those people always have good faces, who are at odds with their conscience." Even after the terrible death of the heroine, her "face remained intact, calm, more alive than dead."
Matryona embodies the national character, which is primarily manifested in her speech. Expressiveness, a bright individuality gives her language an abundance of colloquial, dialectal vocabulary (hurry up, kuzhotkamu, summer, lightning). The manner of her speech is also deeply folk, the way she pronounces her words: “They began with some kind of low warm murmur, like grandmothers in fairy tales.” “Matryonin Dvor” minimally includes the landscape, he pays more attention to the interior, which appears not by itself, but in a lively interweaving with the “inhabitants” and with sounds - from the rustling of mice and cockroaches to the state of ficuses and a rickety cat. Every detail here characterizes not only the peasant life, Matryonin's yard, but also the storyteller. The voice of the narrator reveals in him a psychologist, a moralist, even a poet - in the way he observes Matryona, her neighbors and relatives, how he evaluates them and her. The poetic feeling is manifested in the author's emotions: "Only she had fewer sins than a cat ..."; “But Matryona rewarded me ...”. The lyrical pathos is especially obvious at the very end of the story, where even the syntactic structure changes, including paragraphs, translating the speech into blank verse:
“The Veems lived next to her / and did not understand / that she is the same righteous man, / without whom, according to the proverb, / the village does not stand. /Nor the city./Nor all our land.
The writer was looking for a new word. An example of this is his convincing articles on language in Literaturnaya Gazeta, Dahl's fantastic commitment (the researchers note that about 40% of the vocabulary in the story Solzhenitsyn borrowed from Dahl's dictionary), ingenuity in vocabulary. In the story "Matryona's Dvor" Solzhenitsyn came to the language of preaching.

The meaning of the work

“There are such born angels,” Solzhenitsyn wrote in the article “Repentance and Self-Restriction”, as if characterizing Matryona, “they seem to be weightless, they seem to glide over this slurry, without drowning in it at all, even touching its surface with their feet? Each of us met such people, there are not ten or a hundred of them in Russia, they are the righteous, we saw them, we were surprised (“eccentrics”), we used their kindness, in good moments we answered them the same, they dispose, - and immediately sank back to our doomed depths."
What is the essence of Matrona's righteousness? In life, not by lies, we will now say in the words of the writer himself, uttered much later. Creating this character, Solzhenitsyn places him in the most ordinary circumstances of rural collective farm life in the 1950s. The righteousness of Matrena lies in her ability to preserve her humanness even in such inaccessible conditions for this. As N.S. Leskov wrote, righteousness is the ability to live “without lying, without deceit, without condemning one’s neighbor and without condemning a biased enemy.”
The story was called "brilliant", "a truly brilliant work." In reviews of him, it was noted that even among Solzhenitsyn's stories he stands out for his strict artistry, the integrity of the poetic embodiment, and the consistency of artistic taste.
The story of A.I. Solzhenitsyn "Matryona Dvor" - for all time. It is especially relevant today, when the issues of moral values ​​and life priorities are acute in modern Russian society.

Point of view

Anna Akhmatova
When his big thing came out (“One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich”), I said: all 200 million should read this. And when I read Matrenin Dvor, I cried, and I rarely cry.
V. Surganov
After all, it’s not so much the appearance of Solzhenitsyn’s Matryona that evokes an internal rebuff in us, but the author’s frank admiration for beggarly disinterestedness and no less frank desire to exalt and oppose it to the rapacity of the owner, nesting in those around her, close to her.
(From the book The Word Makes Its Way.
Collection of articles and documents about A.I. Solzhenitsyn.
1962-1974. - M.: Russian way, 1978.)
This is interesting
On August 20, 1956, Solzhenitsyn left for his place of work. There were many such names as "Peat product" in the Vladimir region. Peat product (the local youth called it "Tyr-pyr") - was a railway station 180 kilometers and a four-hour drive from Moscow along the Kazan road. The school was located in the nearby village of Mezinovsky, and Solzhenitsyn had a chance to live two kilometers from the school - in the Meshchera village of Miltsevo.
Only three years will pass, and Solzhenitsyn will write a story that will immortalize these places: a station with a clumsy name, a village with a tiny bazaar, the house of the landlady Matryona Vasilievna Zakharova, and Matryona herself, a righteous woman and a sufferer. A photograph of the corner of the hut, where the guest will put a cot and, having pushed aside the master's ficuses, will arrange a table with a lamp, will go around the whole world.
The teaching staff of Mezinovka consisted of about fifty members that year and significantly influenced the life of the village. There were four schools here: primary, seven-year, secondary and evening for working youth. Solzhenitsyn received a referral to a secondary school - it was in an old one-story building. The academic year began with the August teachers' conference, so, having arrived in Torfoprodukt, the teacher of mathematics and electrical engineering of grades 8-10 managed to go to the Kurlovsky district for a traditional meeting. “Isaich,” as his colleagues dubbed him, could, if desired, refer to a serious illness, but no, he did not talk about it with anyone. We only saw how he was looking for a birch chaga mushroom and some herbs in the forest, and briefly answered questions: “I make medicinal drinks.” He was considered shy: after all, a person suffered ... But that was not the point at all: “I came with my goal, with my past. What could they know, what could u tell them? I sat with Matryona and wrote a novel every free minute. Why am I talking to myself? I didn't have that style. I was a conspirator to the end." Then everyone will get used to the fact that this thin, pale, tall man in a suit and tie, who, like all teachers, wore a hat, coat or raincoat, keeps his distance and does not get close to anyone. He will remain silent when a document on rehabilitation comes in six months - just the school head teacher B.S. Protserov will receive a notification from the village council and send a teacher for help. No talking when the wife starts arriving. “What is it to whom? I live with Matryona and I live. Many were alarmed (isn't it a spy?) that he goes everywhere with a Zorkiy camera and shoots something completely different from what amateurs usually shoot: instead of relatives and friends - houses, wrecked farms, boring landscapes.
Arriving at the school at the beginning of the school year, he proposed his own methodology - giving all classes a control, according to the results he divided the students into strong and mediocre, and then worked individually.
In the lessons, everyone received a separate task, so there was neither the possibility nor the desire to write off. Not only the solution of the problem was valued, but also the method of solution. The introductory part of the lesson was shortened as much as possible: the teacher spared time for "trifles". He knew exactly who and when to call to the board, who to ask more often, who to entrust with independent work. The teacher never sat at the teacher's table. He did not enter the class, but burst into it. He ignited everyone with his energy, knew how to build a lesson in such a way that there was no time to be bored or doze off. He respected his students. Never shouted, never even raised his voice.
And only outside the class Solzhenitsyn was silent and withdrawn. He went home after school, ate the “cardboard” soup prepared by Matryona and sat down to work. The neighbors remembered for a long time how inconspicuously the guest lodged, did not arrange parties, did not participate in fun, but read and wrote everything. “She loved Matryona Isaich,” used to say Shura Romanova, the adopted daughter of Matryona (in the story she is Kira). - Sometimes, she will come to me in Cherusti, I persuade her to stay longer. "No," he says. “I have Isaich - he needs to cook, heat the stove.” And back home."
The lodger also became attached to the lost old woman, cherishing her disinterestedness, conscientiousness, cordial simplicity, a smile that he tried in vain to catch in the camera lens. “So Matryona got used to me, and I to her, and we lived easily. She did not interfere with my long evening classes, did not annoy me with any questions. There was absolutely no woman's curiosity in her, and the lodger did not stir her soul either, but it turned out that they opened up to each other.
She learned about the prison, and about the serious illness of the guest, and about his loneliness. And there was no worse loss for him in those days than the ridiculous death of Matryona on February 21, 1957 under the wheels of a freight train at the crossing of one hundred and eighty-four kilometers from Moscow along the branch that goes to Murom from Kazan, exactly six months after the day he settled in her hut.
(From the book of Lyudmila Saraskina "Alexander Solzhenitsyn")
Matrenin yard is poor, as before
Solzhenitsyn's acquaintance with "condo", "interior" Russia, in which he so wanted to be after the Ekibastuz exile, a few years later was embodied in the world-famous story "Matryona Dvor". This year marks 40 years since its inception. As it turned out, in Mezinovsky itself, this work by Solzhenitsyn became a second-hand rarity. This book is not even available at Matrenin Dvor itself, where Lyuba, the niece of the heroine of Solzhenitsyn's story, now lives. “I had pages from a magazine, the neighbors once asked when they began to study it at school, and they didn’t return it,” complains Lyuba, who today brings up her grandson on disability benefits in the “historical” walls. She inherited Matryona's hut from her mother, the youngest sister of Matryona. The hut was moved to Mezinovsky from the neighboring village of Miltsevo (in Solzhenitsyn's story - Talnovo), where the future writer lodged with Matryona Zakharova (with Solzhenitsyn - Matryona Grigorieva). In the village of Miltsevo, for the visit of Alexander Solzhenitsyn in 1994, a similar, but much more solid house was hastily erected. Shortly after the memorable arrival of Solzhenitsyn, the countrymen uprooted window frames and floorboards from this unguarded building of Matrenina, standing on the outskirts of the village.
The "new" Mezin school, built in 1957, now has 240 students. In the unpreserved building of the old one, in which Solzhenitsyn taught lessons, about a thousand studied. For half a century, not only the Miltsevskaya river became shallow and the peat reserves in the surrounding swamps became scarce, but also the neighboring villages were empty. And at the same time, Solzhenitsyn's Thaddeus did not disappear, calling the good of the people "ours" and considering that losing it is "shameful and stupid."
The crumbling house of Matryona, rearranged to a new place without a foundation, has grown into the ground for two crowns, buckets are put under a thin roof in the rain. Like Matryona, cockroaches are in full swing here, but there are no mice: there are four cats in the house, two of our own and two that have nailed it. Lyuba, a former foundry worker at a local factory, like Matryona, who once straightened out her pension for months, goes to the authorities to extend her disability allowance. “Nobody but Solzhenitsyn helps,” she complains. “Somehow one came in a jeep, called himself Alexei, examined the house and gave money.” Behind the house, like Matryona, there is a garden of 15 acres, on which Lyuba plants potatoes. As before, mint potatoes, mushrooms and cabbage are the main products for her life. In addition to cats, she doesn’t even have a goat in her courtyard, which Matryona had.
So lived and live many Mezinovsky righteous. Local historians write books about the stay of the great writer in Mezinovsky, local poets compose poems, new pioneers write essays “On the difficult fate of Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Nobel laureate”, as they once wrote essays about Brezhnev’s “Virgin lands” and “Small land”. They are thinking of resurrecting the museum hut of Matrena on the outskirts of the deserted village of Miltsevo. And the old Matrenin yard lives the same life as it did half a century ago.
Leonid Novikov, Vladimir region.

Gang Yu. Service Solzhenitsyn // New time. - 1995. No. 24.
Zapevalov V. A. Solzhenitsyn. To the 30th anniversary of the publication of the story "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" // Russian Literature. - 1993. No. 2.
Litvinova V.I. Don't live in lies. Methodological recommendations for the study of A.I. Solzhenitsyn. - Abakan: KhSU publishing house, 1997.
MurinD. One hour, one day, one life of a person in the stories of A.I. Solzhenitsyn // Literature at school. - 1995. No. 5.
Palamarchuk P. Alexander Solzhenitsyn: Guide. - M.,
1991.
SaraskinaL. Alexander Solzhenitsyn. ZhZL series. - M .: Young
guard, 2009.
The word makes its way. Collection of articles and documents about A.I. Solzhenitsyn. 1962-1974. - M .: Russian way, 1978.
ChalmaevV. Alexander Solzhenitsyn: Life and work. - M., 1994.
Urmanov A.V. Works of Alexander Solzhenitsyn. - M., 2003.

Lesson topic: Alexander Isaevich Solzhenitsyn.

Analysis of the story "Matrenin Dvor".

The purpose of the lesson: try to understand how the writer sees the phenomenon of the “simple person”, to understand the philosophical meaning of the story.

During the classes:

  1. Teacher's word.

History of creation.

The story "Matryona Dvor" was written in 1959, published in 1964. "Matryona Dvor" is an autobiographical and reliable work. The original name is “A village does not stand without a righteous man”. Published in Novy Mir, 1963, No. 1.

This is a story about the situation in which he found himself, returning "from the dusty hot desert", that is, from the camp. He wanted to "get lost in Russia", to find a "quiet corner of Russia". The former prisoner could only be hired for hard work, he also wanted to teach. After rehabilitation in 1957, S. worked for some time as a physics teacher in the Vladimir region, lived in the village of Miltsevo with a peasant woman, Matrena Vasilievna Zakharova.

2. Conversation on the story.

1) The name of the heroine.

- Which of the Russian writers of the 19th century had the main character of the same name? What female images in Russian literature could you compare the heroine of the story with?

(Answer: the name of Solzhenitsyn’s heroine evokes the image of Matryona Timofeevna Korchagina, as well as the images of other Nekrasov women - workers: just like them, the heroine of the story “is dexterous for any work, she had to stop her galloping horse, and into a burning hut come in". There is nothing in her appearance from a majestic Slav, you cannot call her a beauty. She is modest and not noticeable.)

2) Portrait.

- Is there an extended portrait of the heroine in the story? What portrait details does the writer focus on?

(Answer: Solzhenitsyn does not give a detailed portrait of Matryona. From chapter to chapter, only one detail is repeated most often - a smile: “a radiant smile”, “the smile of her roundish face”, “smiled at something”, “apologetic half-smile.” It is important for the author to portray not so much the outward beauty of a simple Russian peasant woman, but the inner light streaming from her eyes, and the more clearly emphasize my idea, expressed directly: “Those people always have good faces who are at odds with their conscience.” Therefore, after the terrible death of the heroine, her face remained intact, calm, more alive than dead.)

3) The speech of the heroine.

Write down the most characteristic statements of the heroine. What are the features of her speech?

(Answer: The deeply folk character of Matryona is manifested primarily in her speech. Expressiveness, a bright individuality betray her language with an abundance of colloquial, dialect vocabulary and archaism (2 - I’ll hurry up the days, to the ugly one, love, fly around, help, inconvenience). That's what everyone in the village used to say. Just as deeply popular are Matryona's manner of speech, the way she pronounces her "friendly words." “They started with some kind of low, warm purring, like grandmothers in fairy tales.”

4) Life of Matryona.

- What artistic details create a picture of Matryona's life? How are household items connected with the spiritual world of the heroine?

(Answer: Outwardly, Matryona’s life is striking in its disorder (“she lives in the wilderness”) All her wealth is ficus, a shaggy cat, a goat, mouse cockroaches, a coat altered from a railway overcoat. All this testifies to the poverty of Matryona, who has worked all her life, but only with great difficulty procured a tiny pension for herself. But something else is also important: these mean everyday details reveal her special world. It is no coincidence that the ficus says: "They filled the loneliness of the hostess. They grew freely ... "- and the rustling of cockroaches is compared with the distant sound of the ocean. It seems that nature itself lives in Matryona's house, all living things are drawn to her).

5) The fate of Matryona.

Restore the life story of Matryona? How does Matryona perceive her fate? What role does work play in her life?

(Answer: The events of the story are limited by a clear time frame: summer-winter 1956. Restoring the fate of the heroine, her life dramas, personal troubles, one way or another, are connected with the turns of history: With the First World War, in which Thaddeus was captured, with the Great Patriotic, with which her husband did not return, with the collective farm, which survived from her all the strength and left her without a livelihood.Her fate is a particle of the fate of the whole people.

And today, the inhuman system does not let Matryona go: she was left without a pension, and she is forced to spend whole days on obtaining various certificates; they don’t sell her peat, forcing her to steal, and even on a denunciation they go with a search; the new chairman cut gardens for all disabled people; it is impossible to get cows, since they are not allowed to mow anywhere; They don't even sell train tickets. Matryona does not feel justice, but she does not hold a grudge against fate and people. "She had a sure way to bring back a good mood - work." Not receiving anything for her work, at the first call she goes to help her neighbors, the collective farm. People around her willingly take advantage of her kindness. The villagers and relatives themselves not only do not help Matryona, but also try not to appear in her house at all, fearing that she will ask for help. To each and every one, Matrena remains absolutely alone in her village.

6) The image of Matryona among relatives.

What colors are painted in the story by Faddey Mironovich and Matryona's relatives? How does Thaddeus behave when he takes apart the upper room? What is the conflict in the story?

(Answer: The main character is opposed in the story by her late husband’s brother, Thaddeus. Drawing his portrait, Solzhenitsyn repeats the epithet “black” seven times. A man whose life was broken in his own way by inhuman circumstances, Thaddeus, unlike Matryona, harbored a grudge against fate , taking it out on his wife and son. The almost blind old man, revives when he presses on Matryona about the upper room, and then when he breaks down the hut of his former bride. Self-interest, the thirst to seize a plot for his daughter make him destroy the house that he once "He built it himself. Thaddeus' inhumanity is especially evident on the eve of Matryona's funeral. Thaddeus did not come to Matryona's funeral at all. But the most important thing is that Thaddeus was in the village, that Thaddeus was not alone in the village. At the commemoration, no one talks about Matryona herself.

The eventual conflict in the story is almost absent, because the very nature of Matryona excludes conflict relations with people. For her, good is the inability to do evil, love and compassion. In this substitution of concepts, Solzhenitsyn sees the essence of the spiritual crisis that struck Russia.

7) The tragedy of Matryona.

What signs portend the death of the heroine?

(Answer: From the very first lines, the author prepares us for the tragic denouement of the fate of Matryona. Her death is foreshadowed by the loss of a pot of consecrated water and the disappearance of a cat. For relatives and neighbors, the death of Matryona is just an excuse to gossip about her until the opportunity to profit from her not cunning good, for the narrator is the death of a loved one and the destruction of the whole world, the world of that people's truth, without which the Russian land does not stand)

8) The image of the narrator.

What is common in the fate of the narrator and Matryona?

(Answer: The narrator is a man of a difficult family, behind whom there is a war and a camp. Therefore, he is lost in a quiet corner of Russia. And only in Matryona's hut did the hero feel something akin to his heart. And the lonely Matryona felt trust in her guest. Only she tells him about his bitter past, only he will reveal to her that he spent a lot in prison. The heroes have in common both the drama of their fate and many life principles. Their relationship is especially evident in speech. And only the death of the mistress forced the narrator to comprehend her spiritual essence, which is why it sounds so strong in the final story motive of repentance.

9) What is the theme of the story?

(Answer: The main theme of the story is "how people live."

Why is the fate of an old peasant woman, told in a few pages, of such interest to us?

(Answer: This woman is unread, illiterate, a simple worker. To survive what Matryona Vasilievna had to endure, and remain a disinterested, open, delicate, sympathetic person, not be angry at fate and people, keep her “radiant smile” until old age - what mental strength is needed for this!

10) -What is the symbolic meaning of the story "Matryona Dvor"?

(Answer: Many symbols of S. are associated with Christian symbols: the images are symbols of the way of the cross, the righteous, the martyr. The first name “Matryona Yard” indicates this directly. And the name itself is of a generalizing nature. finds the narrator after many years of camps and homelessness. The fate of the house is, as it were, repeated, the fate of its mistress is predicted. Forty years have passed here. In this house she survived two wars - German and Patriotic, the death of six children who died in infancy, the loss of her husband, who went missing in the war. The house falls into disrepair - the mistress grows old. The house is dismantled like a man - "by the ribs". Matryona dies along with the chambermaid. With part of her house. The hostess dies - the house is completely destroyed. Matrona's hut was filled up until spring, like a coffin - buried.

Conclusion:

The righteous Matryona is the moral ideal of the writer, on which, in his opinion, the life of society should be based.

The folk wisdom that the writer put into the original title of the story accurately conveys this author's thought. Matryonin's yard is a kind of island in the middle of an ocean of lies, which keeps the treasure of the national spirit. The death of Matrena, the destruction of her yard and hut is a formidable warning of a catastrophe that can happen to a society that has lost its moral guidelines. However, despite all the tragedy of the work, the story is imbued with the author's faith in the resilience of Russia. Solzhenitsyn sees the source of this resilience not in the political system, not in state power, not in the power of arms, but in the simple hearts of the unnoticed, humiliated, most often lonely righteous people who oppose the world of lies.)


A. N. Solzhenitsyn, returning from exile, worked as a teacher at the Miltsev school. He lived in an apartment with Matrena Vasilievna Zakharova. All events described by the author were real. Solzhenitsyn's story "Matryona's Dvor" describes the difficult life of a collective farm Russian village. We offer for review an analysis of the story according to the plan, this information can be used to work in literature lessons in grade 9, as well as in preparation for the exam.

Brief analysis

Year of writing– 1959

History of creation– The writer began work on his work on the problems of the Russian village in the summer of 1959 on the Crimean coast, where he was visiting his friends in exile. Being wary of censorship, it was recommended to change the title "A village without a righteous man" and, on the advice of Tvardovsky, the writer's story was called "Matryona's Dvor".

Subject- The main theme of this work is the life and life of the Russian hinterland, the problems of the relationship of an ordinary person with power, moral problems.

Composition- The narration is on behalf of the narrator, as if through the eyes of an outside observer. The features of the composition allow us to understand the very essence of the story, where the characters will come to the realization that the meaning of life is not only (and not so much) in enrichment, material values, but in moral values, and this problem is universal, and not a single village.

Genre– The genre of the work is defined as “monumental story”.

Direction- Realism.

History of creation

The writer's story is autobiographical; indeed, after his exile, he taught in the village of Miltsevo, which in the story is called Talnovo, and rented a room from Zakharova Matrena Vasilievna. In his short story, the writer depicted not only the fate of one hero, but also the entire epoch-making idea of ​​the country's formation, all its problems and moral principles.

Myself the meaning of the name"Matryona's Yard" is a reflection of the main idea of ​​the work, where the boundaries of her court expand to the scale of the whole country, and the idea of ​​morality turns into universal problems. From this we can conclude that the history of the creation of the "Matryona Dvor" does not include a separate village, but the history of the creation of a new outlook on life, and on the power that governs the people.

Subject

After analyzing the work in Matrenin Dvor, it is necessary to determine main theme story, to find out what the autobiographical essay teaches not only the author himself, but, by and large, the whole country.

The life and work of the Russian people, their relationship with the authorities are deeply illuminated. A person works all his life, losing his personal life and interests in work. Your health, after all, without getting anything. Using the example of Matrena, it is shown that she worked all her life, without any official documents about her work, and did not even earn a pension.

All the last months of its existence were spent on collecting different pieces of paper, and the red tape and bureaucracy of the authorities also led to the fact that one and the same piece of paper had to go to get more than once. Indifferent people sitting at tables in offices can easily put the wrong seal, signature, stamp, they do not care about people's problems. So Matryona, in order to achieve a pension, more than once bypasses all instances, somehow achieving a result.

Villagers think only about their own enrichment, for them there are no moral values. Faddey Mironovich, her husband's brother, forced Matryona to give the promised part of the house to her adopted daughter, Kira, during her lifetime. Matryona agreed, and when, out of greed, two sledges were hooked to one tractor, the cart fell under the train, and Matryona died along with her nephew and the tractor driver. Human greed is above all, that very evening, her only friend, Aunt Masha, came to her house to pick up the little thing promised to her, until Matryona's sisters stole it.

And Faddey Mironovich, who also had a coffin with his dead son in his house, still managed to bring the logs abandoned at the crossing before the funeral, and did not even come to pay tribute to the memory of the woman who died a terrible death because of his irrepressible greed. Matrena's sisters, first of all, took away her funeral money, and began to divide the remains of the house, crying over her sister's coffin not from grief and sympathy, but because it was supposed to be.

In fact, humanly, no one took pity on Matryona. Greed and greed blinded the eyes of fellow villagers, and people will never understand Matryona that with her spiritual development a woman stands at an unattainable height from them. She is truly righteous.

Composition

The events of that time are described from the perspective of an outsider, a lodger who lived in Matryona's house.

Narrator starts his narrative from the time he was looking for a job as a teacher, trying to find a remote village to live. By the will of fate, he ended up in the village where Matryona lived, and decided to stay with her.

In the second part, the narrator describes the difficult fate of Matryona, who has not seen happiness since her youth. Her life was hard, in everyday work and worries. She had to bury all her six children born. Matryona endured a lot of torment and grief, but she did not become embittered, and her soul did not harden. She is still hardworking and disinterested, benevolent and peaceful. She never condemns anyone, she treats everyone evenly and kindly, as before, she works in her farmstead. She died trying to help her relatives move her own part of the house.

In the third part, the narrator describes the events after the death of Matryona, all the same soullessness of people, relatives and relatives of the woman who, after the death of the woman, swooped like crows into the remains of her yard, trying to quickly take everything apart and plunder, condemning Matryona for her righteous life.

Main characters

Genre

The publication of Matryona Dvor caused much controversy among Soviet critics. Tvardovsky wrote in his notes that Solzhenitsyn is the only writer who expresses his opinion without regard to the authorities and the opinion of critics.

Everyone unequivocally came to the conclusion that the work of the writer belongs to "monumental story", so in a high spiritual genre the description of a simple Russian woman, personifying universal human values, is given.

Artwork test

Analysis Rating

Average rating: 4.7. Total ratings received: 1601.

In the summer of 1956, the hero of the story, Ignatich, returns to central Russia from Asian camps. In the story, he is endowed with the function of the narrator. The hero works as a teacher in a rural school and settles in the village of Talnovo in the hut of sixty-year-old Matryona Vasilievna Grigorieva. The tenant and the hostess turn out to be people who are spiritually close to each other. In Ignatich's story about Matrena's everyday life, in the assessments of the people around her, in her actions, judgments and memories of what she experienced, the fate of the heroine and her inner world are revealed to the reader. The fate of Matrena, her image becomes for the hero a symbol of fate and the image of Russia itself.

In winter, Matrena's husband's relatives take part of the house - the upper room - from the heroine. While transporting a dismantled room, Matryona Vasilievna dies at a railway crossing under the wheels of a steam locomotive, trying to help the men to take out the stuck sleigh with logs from the crossing. Matryona appears in the story as a moral ideal, as the embodiment of the lofty spiritual and moral principles of the people's life that are forced out by the course of history. She - in the eyes of the hero-narrator - is one of those righteous people on whom the world stands.

With its genre features, Solzhenitsyn's story approaches the essay and goes back to the Turgenev tradition of the Hunter's Notes. Along with this, Matrenin Dvor, as it were, continues the tradition of Leskov's stories about the Russian righteous. In the author's version, the story was called "The Village Doesn't Stand Without a Righteous Man", but it was first published under the title "Matryona Dvor".

The fate of the hero-narrator of Solzhenitsyn's story "Matrenin Dvor" is correlated with the fate of the heroes of the story "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich". Ignatich, as it were, continues the fate of Shukhov and his camp comrades. His story tells what awaits the prisoners in life after release. Therefore, the first important problem in the story becomes the problem of choosing the hero of his place in the world.

Ignatich, who spent ten years in prison and camp, after living in exile in the "dusty hot desert", seeks to settle in a quiet corner of Russia, "where it would not be a shame to live and die." The hero wants to find a place in his native land that would preserve the original features and signs of folk life unchanged. Ignatich hopes to find spiritual and moral support, peace of mind in the traditional national way of life, which has withstood the destructive influence of the inexorable course of history. He finds it in the village of Talnovo, settling in the hut of Matryona Vasilievna.

What explains this choice of hero?

The hero of the story refuses to accept the terrible inhuman absurdity of existence, which has become the norm of life of contemporaries and has multiple manifestations in the daily way of life of people. Solzhenitsyn shows this with the ruthlessness of a publicist in the story "Matryona's Dvor". One example is the careless, nature-destroying actions of the chairman of the collective farm, who received the title of Hero of Socialist Labor for the successful destruction of centuries-old forests.

The consequence of the abnormal course of history, the illogical way of life is the tragic fate of the hero. The absurdity and unnaturalness of the new way of life is especially noticeable in cities and industrial towns. Therefore, the hero aspires to the outback of Russia, wants to "settle ... forever" "somewhere away from the railway." The railway is a traditional symbol for Russian classical literature of a soulless modern civilization that brings destruction and death to man. In this sense, the railway appears in Solzhenitsyn's story.

At first, the hero's wish seems impossible. He bitterly notices both in the life of the village of Vysokoye Pole and in the village of Torfoprodukt (“Ah, Turgenev did not know that it was possible to compose such things in Russian!” the narrator says about the name of the village) the terrible realities of the new way of life. Therefore, the village of Talnovo, Matryona's house and she herself become the last hope for the hero, the last opportunity to fulfill his dream. Matryona's yard becomes for the hero the desired embodiment of that Russia, which was so important to him to find.

In Matryona, Ignatich sees the spiritual and moral ideal of a Russian person. What character traits, personality traits of Matryona allow us to see in her the embodiment of the high spiritual and moral principles of the people's life that have been supplanted by the course of history? What narrative techniques are used to create the image of the heroine in the story?

First of all, we see Matryona in an everyday environment, in a series of daily worries and affairs. Describing the actions of the heroine, the narrator seeks to penetrate into their hidden meaning, to understand their motives.

In the story about the first meeting between Ignatich and Matryona, we see the sincerity, simplicity, unselfishness of the heroine. “It was only later that I found out,” says the narrator, “that year after year, for many years, Matryona Vasilievna did not earn a single ruble from anywhere. Because she didn't get paid. Her family did little to help her. And on the collective farm she worked not for money - for sticks. But Matrena does not seek to get a profitable tenant. She fears that she will not be able to please a new person, that he will not like it in her house, which she directly tells the hero about. But Matryona is pleased when Ignatich still stays with her, because with a new person her loneliness comes to an end.

Matryona has inner tact and delicacy. Getting up long before the guest, she “quietly, politely, trying not to make noise, stoked the Russian stove, went to milk the goat,” “she didn’t invite guests to her place in the evenings, respecting my work,” says Ignatich. In Matryona there is no "woman's curiosity", she "did not annoy with any questions" to the hero. Ignatich is especially captivated by the benevolence of Matrena, her kindness is revealed in a disarming "radiant smile" that transforms the whole appearance of the heroine. “Those people always have good faces who are at odds with their conscience,” concludes the narrator.

“Deeds called to life,” says the narrator about Matryona. Work becomes for the heroine and a way to restore peace in her soul. “She had a sure way to regain her good mood - work,” the narrator notes.

Working on a collective farm, Matrena did not receive anything for her work, helping her fellow villagers, she refused money. Her work is selfless. Working for Matryona is as natural as breathing. Therefore, the heroine considers it inconvenient and impossible to take money for her work.

A new way to create the image of Matryona is the introduction of the heroine's memories into the narrative. They demonstrate new facets of her personality, in which the heroine reveals herself in full.

From the memoirs of Matrena, we learn that in her youth she, like the heroine of Nekrasov, stopped a galloping horse. Matryona is capable of a decisive, even desperate act, but behind this is not a love of risk, not recklessness, but a desire to ward off misfortune. The desire to ward off misfortune, to help people will dictate the behavior of the heroine in the last minutes of her life before her death, when she rushed to help the peasants to pull out the sleigh stuck at the railway crossing. Matryona remains true to herself to the end.

“But Matryona was by no means fearless,” the narrator notes. “She was afraid of the fire, she was afraid of the lightning, and most of all, for some reason, the train.” From one kind of train, Matryona "throws into a fever, her knees are shaking." The panic fear experienced by Matrena from one kind of train, which at first causes a smile, by the end of the story, after the death of the heroine under its wheels, acquires the meaning of a tragically true foreboding.

In the heroine's recollections of the experience, it is revealed that she has self-esteem, cannot bear the insults and resolutely protests when her husband raised his hand against her.

The outbreak of the First World War separates her from her loved one, Thaddeus, and predetermines the entire subsequent tragic course of Matryona's life. For three years, new tragedies have occurred in the life of Russia: “And one revolution. And another revolution. And the whole world turned upside down. Matrona's life was also turned upside down. Like the whole country, Matrena faces a “terrible choice”: she must choose her own fate, answer the question: how to live on? The younger brother of Thaddeus, Yefim, wooed Matryona. The heroine married him - started a new life, chose her fate. But the choice was wrong. Six months later, Thaddeus returns from captivity. In the disastrous game of passions that gripped him, Thaddeus is ready to kill Matryona and her chosen one. But Thaddeus is stopped by a moral prohibition that still exists in life - he does not dare to go against his brother.

For the heroine, there is no turning back. The choice of Matryona does not bring her happiness. A new life does not add up, her marriage is fruitless.

In 1941, the world war began again, and in the life of Matryona, the tragedy experienced in the First World War was repeated again. As in the first war Matryona lost her beloved, so in the second she loses her husband. The inexorable course of time dooms Matrenin Dvor to death: “The once noisy hut rotted and grew old, and now it’s a deserted hut - and the homeless Matryona grew old in it.”

Solzhenitsyn reinforces this motif, showing that the terrible inhuman absurdity of existence, which has become the norm of people's lives in a new historical era and from which the hero was looking for salvation in Matryona's house, did not pass the heroine. A new way of life relentlessly invades Matryona's life. The eleven post-war years of collective farm life were marked by the aggressive, inhuman stupidity and cynicism of collective farm practices. It seems that Matryona and her fellow villagers were experimented with for survival: the collective farm was not paid money for labor, they “cut off” personal gardens, did not allocate mowing for livestock, and deprived them of fuel for the winter. A celebration of the absurdity of collective farm life appears in the story as the transfer of the property of Matryona, who worked for many years on the collective farm: “a dirty white goat, a crooked cat, ficuses.” But Matryona managed to overcome all the hardships and hardships and keep the peace of her soul unchanged.

Matrona's house and its mistress appear as opposed to the surrounding world, the illogical and unnatural way of life that has established itself in it. The world of people feels this and cruelly takes revenge on Matryona.

This motif receives plot development in the story of the destruction of Matrenin's yard. Contrary to the fate that doomed her to loneliness, Matrena raised Thaddeus's daughter, Kira, for ten years, and became her second mother. Matryona decided: after her death, half of the house, the upper room, should be inherited by Kira. But Thaddeus, with whom Matryona once wanted to unite her life, decides to take the upper room during the life of her mistress.

In the actions of Thaddeus and his assistants, Solzhenitsyn sees a manifestation of the triumph of a new way of life. The new way of life formed a special attitude to the world, determined the new nature of human relationships. The terrible inhumanity and absurdity of the existence of people is revealed by the author in the substitution of concepts established in the minds of contemporaries, when “our language terribly calls our property” “good”. In the plot of the story, this "good" turns into an all-destroying evil. The pursuit of such “good”, which “losing is considered shameful and stupid before people”, turns into a different, immeasurably greater loss of true and enduring good: the world is losing a good, beautiful person - Matryona, high spiritual and moral principles are lost in life. The desperate and reckless pursuit of "good-property" brings death to the human soul, calls to life the terrible destructive properties of human nature - selfishness, cruelty, greed, aggressiveness, greed, cynicism, pettiness. All these base passions will manifest themselves in the people surrounding Matryona, determining their behavior in the history of the destruction of her home and the death of herself. The soul of Matrena, her inner world is opposed to the souls and inner world of the people around her. The soul of Matryona is beautiful because, according to Solzhenitsyn, the purpose of Matryona's life was not good-property, but good-love.

Matryona's house becomes in Solzhenitsyn's story a symbol of the harmonious traditional way of peasant life, high spiritual and moral values, which Matryona is the guardian of. Therefore, she and the house are inseparable. The heroine intuitively feels this: “it was terrible for her to start breaking the roof under which she had lived for forty years. ... for Matryona it was the end of her whole life, ”concludes the narrator. But Thaddeus and his assistants think otherwise. The fatal passions of the hero are no longer held back - there are no longer moral prohibitions on their way. They "knew that her house could be broken in her lifetime."

Matrenin's Yard, where the hero of the story found spiritual and moral support, becomes the last stronghold of the traditional national way of life, which could not resist the destructive influence of the inexorable course of history.

The destruction of Matrona's house becomes in the story a symbol of the violation of the natural course of historical time, fraught with catastrophic upheavals. Thus, the death of Matrenin's court becomes an accusation of a new historical era.

The final chord in creating the image of the heroine becomes in the finale of the story, after the death of Matryona, a comparison of her with the people around her. The tragic death of Matryona was supposed to shock people, make them think, awaken their souls, shake off the veil from their eyes. But that doesn't happen. The new way of life has devastated the souls of people, their hearts have hardened, they have no place for compassion, empathy, genuine sorrow. This is shown by Solzhenitsyn at the rites of farewell, funeral, commemoration of Matryona. The rites are losing their lofty, mournful, tragic meaning; all that remains of them is a ossified form, mechanically repeated by the participants. The tragedy of death is not able to stop their mercenary and conceited aspirations in people.

The loneliness of Matrena in life after her death takes on a special and new meaning. She is lonely because the spiritual and moral world of Matryona objectively, in addition to the will of the heroine, opposes the values ​​of the world of the people around her. The world of Matrena was alien and incomprehensible to them, it caused irritation and condemnation. So the image of Matryona allows the author to show in the story the moral trouble and spiritual emptiness of modern society.

The narrator's acquaintance with the people surrounding Matryona helps him fully understand her high destiny in the world of people. Matryona, who did not accumulate property, endured cruel trials and withstood her spirit, is “the same righteous man, without whom, according to the proverb, the village does not stand.

Neither city.

Not all our land."