Literary analysis of Prishvin's work Pantry of the Sun. Fairy-tale features in the story

M. M. Prishvin entered literature not only as a talented writer, but also as an ethnographer, geographer, and cosmographer. However, his works were not in demand in Soviet society. Ideal for the literature of that time were works full of high civil and revolutionary pathos, saturated with the socialist slogans of those years. Prishvin's work was considered an attempt to get away from real life, from solving pressing problems to building a bright future. Prishvin's discovery as talented artist words took place only in last decades. Today he is one of the most unsolved writers.

The nature of his work had a huge influence on all his work. native land. Was born future writer on the Khrushchevo estate. It was here that he learned to listen and hear the sounds of nature, its sometimes quiet and sometimes loud speech. Prishvin was very gifted with hearing “for the whistling of birds, the breathing of grass and the murmuring of animals.” He tried his best to convey the voice of nature, to translate it into human language. We are amazed at this ability of his while reading the story “The Pantry of the Sun.”

The plot of this work is quite simple. This is a story about the life and adventures of two little children who were left orphans during difficult times. post-war years. But Prishvin wraps his heroes in such a poetic shell that everything that happens becomes like a fairy tale. This is exactly the genre that Prishvin chooses for his work - a fairy tale. The concept of “fairy tale” will become central in Prishvin’s work in the 20-50s. For the writer, this concept was the form of artistic storytelling in which he could freely embody his ideals and depict the immutable laws of nature. In “Pantry of the Sun” he creates the image of an ideal village where everyone lives peacefully, amicably, okay. And the small family - brother Mitrasha and sister Nastya - are everyone’s favorites, they are two little suns.

“Nastya was like Golden Hen on high legs. Her hair, neither dark nor light, shimmered with gold, the freckles all over her face were large, like gold coins...<…>Only one nose was clean and looked up. Mitrasha was two years younger than his sister.<…>He was a stubborn and strong boy. “A little man in a bag,” the teachers at school called him smiling among themselves. “The little man in the bag,” like Nastya, was covered in golden freckles, and his nose, clean, like his sister’s, looked up.” The author lovingly describes his characters and gives them cute names. And this also somewhat resembles a fairy tale.

And so our little heroes set off on a long journey to a Palestinian woman, whom they know about from their father’s stories. This is reminiscent of the saying: “go there, I don’t know where.” Children find themselves in a huge fairyland, where every bush, every bird has the ability to speak and think. The author places us in wonderful world nature, while he tries his best to show the kinship of man with this natural world: “poor birds and little animals, how they all suffered, trying to pronounce some common beautiful word! And even children, as simple as Nastya and Mitrasha, understood their effort. They all wanted to say just one beautiful word. You can see how the bird sings on the branch, and every feather trembles with effort. But still, they cannot say words like we do, and they have to sing, shout, and tap.

Tek-tek! - a huge bird, the wood grouse, taps barely audibly in the dark forest.

Shvark-shwark! — a wild drake flew in the air over the river.

Crack-crack! — wild duck mallard on the lake.

Gu-gu-gu... - beautiful bird bullfinch on a birch."

The author appears here as a person with a keen ear, capable of hearing and understanding the wonderful language of birds, plants and animals. Prishvin uses a wide variety of means of artistic expression. But the most important technique with the help of which the heroes of the natural world come to life on the pages of the work is personification. In the fairy tale, not only animals, but also birds and even trees had the ability to think. These are raven and crow talking, and cranes announcing the coming of the sun and its sunset, and the groan of fused pine and spruce. Material from the site

Nature is not inactive, it actively comes to the aid of man. The old women also warn Mitrash about the trouble, but in vain they try to block his path to the destructive tree. And the black raven scares him with its cry. What can we say about the intelligent, quick-witted and devoted dog Travka!

Thus, main topic in were - the theme of the unity of man and nature. In his works, Prishvin “condenses goodness,” he embodies his ideals and thereby calls on readers to goodness.

Plan

1. The friendly life of Nastya and Mitrasha in the village.
2. Children gather for cranberries.
3. The guys quarreled and went different paths.
4. Nastya finds a Palestinian woman, all strewn with cranberries, and Mitrasha, due to her mistake, ends up in a swamp.
5. Forester Antipych's dog Travka helps Mitrash out of trouble.
6. The little hunter kills the old wolf robber Gray Landowner, and the children return home.

Didn't find what you were looking for? Use the search

On this page there is material on the following topics:

• essay with a plan on the topic Prishvin's pantry of the sun
• essay with plan for sun pantry
• Russian and literature 865 Pantry of the sun essay plan The hard way person to the truth of life
• what Prishvin wanted to convey in the fairy tale was the pantry of the sun
• Questions about Prishvin's works for children

It is clear that Prishvin is playing interestingly fairy tale motifs, for example, the reader has no doubt that the events are actually happening, although there is a lot in the story fairy tale characters. Even Nastya is compared to the Golden Hen, and Mitrash is called “A Little Man in a Bag”.

The story “The Pantry of the Sun,” which we are analyzing, tells about the adventures of children who were left orphans. These children find themselves in such difficult situations. life circumstances, which would be difficult for adults too. Children have to become adults early and solve “adult” problems. What qualities do they display in such conditions? Nastya, for example, is very economical, Mitrasha is a skilled craftsman, he can even make dishes out of wood.

The author's attitude towards his characters is clearly visible. He calls them “our favorites.” It is clear that Mitrasha and Nastya have misunderstandings and squabbles from time to time, but the brother tries to show that he is now the main one in the house. However, all these quarrels are cute because the brother and sister generally love each other. The image of the main characters is well revealed in the situation when the children decide to go pick cranberries. This point is very important when analyzing “The Pantry of the Sun”. How thoroughly and seriously they approach their preparations! The brother talks about the “Palestinian woman,” remembering his father’s story. He hopes to find a “Palestinian” so he can get more sweet cranberries. As a result, an unnecessary argument breaks out between the guys, and everyone goes into the forest on their own.

Important details of the "Pantry of the Sun" analysis

Nature plays a key role in Prishvin’s fairy tale “The Pantry of the Sun”. Prishvin not only skillfully described nature, but also “revitalized” it, presenting it as an independent character who has his own life. Nature even expresses its attitude towards what happens to children in a special way and influences their lives. After Mitrash quarreled with Nastya and they separated, the wind began to howl angrily and shake the trees with groans, and the sun disappeared. Thus, it became clear that the heroes must prepare for trials.

The author created the image of the old man Antipych in a fabulous way - it is not known how old he is, it is only clear that he is very old. In his speech, Antipych speaks in riddles every now and then, and besides, he understands the language of his dog Travka and can explain himself to her. Antipych told Travka main secret life, which consists in the ability to love and be loved, and such mutual love should be between living beings, especially if one of them needs help. It is no coincidence that we are talking about living beings, which include not only people. For example, when old Antipych died, it became a misfortune primarily for Travka, who eventually began to consider our main character Mitrasha as “little Antipych.” This happened after a dog rescued a boy from a swamp.

Of course, when analyzing the fairy tale “The Pantry of the Sun” by Prishvin, it is necessary to note what was the reason for the trials of Mitrasha and Nastya. Mitrasha relied on himself, forgetting folk wisdom. He headed into the swamp itself, which almost killed him. And Nastya was overcome by greed, who collected cranberries for herself, going further and further. When the girl realized that she had climbed too far, she screamed. But her cry was caused by fear for her brother, and Mitrash caught her voice. Nastya herself realized that she was wrong and reproaches herself.

Conclusions about the characters of the main characters

The dog Travka did not immediately begin to perceive Mitrasha as his new owner. Only when the hero called out to his dog savior did she accept his power. Finding himself in great danger, Mitrasha showed adult qualities, strength and courage, and Grass felt it. In addition, a seasoned predator who stood in the way of Mitrashi was killed by a man, and this is another manifestation of strength and courage.

We hope that this analysis The story "Pantry of the Sun" will be useful for you. Visit our literary Blog more often, share articles with friends.

Mikhail Mikhailovich Prishvin's story “The Pantry of the Sun” tells about orphans, how they coped with difficulties, how they learned to live without parents.

The author describes the main characters very carefully. The girl, Nastya, the eldest in the family, seems to the reader to be responsible and very hardworking. She has freckles on her face, blond hair, fragile and very smart. She always gave in to her brother, tried to do the best and helped him in everything. The author calls her a golden chicken with high legs. In my opinion, it was not for nothing that Mikhail Mikhailovich gave such a nickname to Nastya. Throughout the story, he writes about her with respect. Nastya got up before sunrise, drove the herd of cows out to pasture and, without going to bed, did all the housework until nightfall.

Mitrash, brother main character, the author describes as “a little man in a bag.” He learned some craft from his father and took care of men's household chores. Mitrasha sold or exchanged the results of his craft. This is how the orphans lived, arranging their lives.

The author of the story very accurately divides household responsibilities between the children. Left alone, without parents, Nastya and Mitrasha do household chores together. “The golden hen on high legs and the little man in the bag” do women's and men's chores, respectively. This division of labor between children gives them, in my opinion, the cohesion and friendship that should exist between family members.

One day the children decide to go get cranberries. In the forest they diverge along different paths. Mitrasha ends up in a swamp and cannot get out for a long time, and Nastya, carried away by picking cranberries, forgets about her brother. A forester's dog named Travka helps the children find each other.

Mikhail Prishvin called his story “Pantry of the Sun” because there is a lot of peat in the forest swamps. During times Patriotic War this fuel was very valuable, and remains valuable to this day.

In my opinion, the author of the story very accurately conveyed the entire atmosphere that should exist between children who were left without parents. Prishvin showed brotherly and sisterly love. Nastya and Mitrasha were always together and lived in peace. After all, they were left alone in the whole world, and dearer friend they have no friend. The author clearly shows in his work what can happen if a brother and sister do not get along with each other.

After reading the story “Pantry of the Sun,” every reader will ask the question: how do I feel about my sister or my brother? After all dearer than sister or the person has no brother. They should always be together and help each other. To better understand how to treat to a loved one, it is worth reading this story.

Analysis Pantry of the Sun - where is the truth and where is the fairy tale

The work was written in 1945, so its plot and characters in the story correspond to that difficult time for the country.

The plot is simple. In some Russian village there live a boy and a girl. They live alone because they are orphans - their father died in the war, and their mother died of illness. The girl is 12 years old, the boy is 10 years old. They have a house, they have pets: a cow, sheep, chickens.

When you start reading the story, you immediately realize that it is fiction. It can’t be that the kids don’t have relatives in the village. It cannot be that the children of the deceased Red Army soldier were not placed in orphanage. And how, at that age, did they manage a household that even an adult couldn’t handle?

Further events develop like this. A common village thing: the children went into the forest to pick berries (cranberries). The girl, of course, carries a basket, and the boy, in today’s terminology – “cool”, takes with him a gun and a compass. Well, the compass is clear - a toy, but the gun is taller than a ten-year-old boy. How will he carry it? But the author comes up with an excuse: a lonely and hungry wolf lives in the forest. So, for protection from the wolf, he took a gun with him.

I should note that the fabulousness is also in the title of the story: “The Pantry of the Sun.” This, according to the author's idea, is the name of the swamp. But Russians never fired their stoves with peat. We had enough firewood. And such a name would never have been given to the swamp. They were far from the scientific idea that peat, coal and oil are a concentrate of solar energy.

So the boy and the girl went into the forest and, of course, quarreled (as in the fairy tale - don’t drink water - you’ll become a little goat). The brother did not listen to his sister: he did not follow the path, but followed the compass. He reached the swamp and fell into the swamp there. Thank God he had a gun with him! He grabbed the gun and did not drown.

And then a stray dog ​​(man’s friend) came to the rescue and pulled him out of the swamp. And then he shot the evil wolf. Then his sister, having collected cranberries, found him, and they returned home. And in the village everyone was already alarmed: where did the children go? This is a semi-fairy-tale story.

The story is written beautifully, but what does it teach us? Maybe live together, love dogs and kill wolves. Or - don’t go, the children are alone in the forest: wolves live there.

Several interesting essays

My grandmother's name is Anna. She is very good and kind. I always call her grandma because she deserves that word. Grandma always played with me, bought me a lot of goodies, taught me how to bake pies. She always read me different fairy tales at night

• The problem of honor and duty in the novel The Captain's Daughter by Pushkin

  In the novel by Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin Captain's daughter many problems are touched upon, one of which is the problem of honor and duty.

• Analysis of Platonov's story Doubting Makar 11th grade

  Many of Platonov’s works, one way or another, touch upon the theme human relations, revealing its very essence, showing human nature, and creating from it a very unpleasant image for perception

• Heroes of the play Our people - let's be numbered! Ostrovsky

  Samson Silych Bolshov is the head of the family, a peasant by birth, a merchant and the owner of a significant fortune. His main value is money, and at one point he decides to pull off a scam

• The image and characteristics of Annushka in the novel The Master and Margarita Bulgakova

  We learn about Annushka for the first time in the first and fourth chapters of the novel. A mysterious foreign guest named Woland mentions the name of Annushka as a kind of fatal prototype of a woman who has the power to change the current time of events.

The study of “The Pantry of the Sun” should be considered as a continuation and development of the theme “ Native nature" The teacher's task in in this case is complicated by the fact that the fairy tale “The Pantry of the Sun” is not just a work about nature. IN diary entry M. Prishvin says: “In „Pantry“I wrote that truth is a harsh struggle for love...” Prishvin creates a fairy tale “for everyone.” The meaning contained in it is deep. Just as the sun deposited its energy in peat deposits, the writer placed in the “Pantry of the Sun” everything that he had accumulated over the years. for many years: good attitude for people, love for nature... Truth is not just love for a person. It is concluded in a harsh struggle for love and is revealed in the clash of two principles: evil and love. “On one side of the semicircle a dog howls, on the other a wolf howls... What a pitiful howl it is. But you, a passer-by, if you hear and a response arises in you, do not believe in pity: it is not a dog howling, truest friend a person is a wolf, his worst enemy, doomed to death by his very malice. You, passer-by, save your pity not for the one who howls about himself like a wolf, but for the one who, like a dog that has lost its owner, howls, not knowing who now, after him, to serve.” 9 .

Evil, seeking to satisfy predatory instincts, encounters the power of love, the passionate desire to survive. Therefore, Prishvin’s fairy tale shines not only with love - there is a struggle in it, a clash of good and evil in it.

The author used some techniques of a traditional fairy tale. There are confluences of almost fabulous accidents and coincidences here. Animals take an active part in the fate of children. Raven, poisonous snake, magpie, wolf nicknamed Gray Landowner are hostile to children. The dog Grass, a representative of “good nature,” faithfully serves man. It is interesting to note that the tale was originally called "Man's Friend." All the author’s philosophical discussions about the “true truth” are placed in the chapters telling about Grass.

And at the same time, the events in the work have real basis. “Pantry of the Sun” was written in 1945, after the end of the Great Patriotic War. And “back in 1940, the author spoke about his intention to work on a story about how two children quarreled and how they went along two separate roads, not knowing that in the forest very often such bypass roads are again connected into one common one. The children met, and the road itself reconciled them.” 10 (according to the memoirs of V.D. Prishvina).

The technique of merging the fabulous and the real made it possible for the writer to express his ideal, the dream of the high purpose of man, of his responsibility to all life on earth. The fairy tale is permeated with the writer’s optimistic faith in the closeness and possibility of realizing this dream, if one looks for its embodiment in real life, among seemingly ordinary people. The writer expressed this idea primarily in the main characters of the work - Nastya and Mitrash.

The originality of the work is the revelation of man through nature, through man’s relationship to nature. Prishvin wrote: “After all, my friends, I write about nature, but I myself only think about people.”

Possible distribution of material among lessons

Part of the first lesson is devoted to getting acquainted with individual facts of the biography of M. M. Prishvin, as well as his works. This will awaken interest in the work of the writer, with whom most sixth-graders will become acquainted for the first time. In this case, it would be possible to invite students to read in advance some of his works - stories in the collections “Forest Drops”, “Floors of the Forest”, “Golden Meadow”, “Forest Doctor”, etc., and then in a small conversation at the beginning of the lesson to express their opinion or read a review of a book you’ve read.

M. M. Prishvin was born in 1873 near Yelets, on the noble estate of Khrushchevo, owned by his father, who came from Yelets merchants. He grew up among peasant children, studied at the Yelets gymnasium and was expelled from there with a “wolf ticket” for a major quarrel with the teacher. Then Prishvin studied at a real school in Tyumen, passed exams as an external student for a classical gymnasium course, and entered the Riga Polytechnic Institute. For participation in the social democratic student organization was arrested and, after a year's imprisonment, deported to his homeland under open police supervision. In 1899, Prishvin traveled to Germany, to Leipzig, from where he returned four years later with a diploma in agronomist. He works at an experimental agricultural station, preparing himself for scientific and pedagogical activities in the laboratory of Academician D. N. Pryanishnikov. But his awakened interest in literature forces him to dramatically change his destiny.

Since 1905, Prishvin became a travel writer, ethnographer, and essayist. Publishes books. Actively collaborates in newspapers. He travels and walks around the country. He maintained this way of life until old age. Prishvin admitted more than once that he embodied in him the dreams and fairy tales of his own childhood...

In children's literature, Prishvin remained as the author of several collections of stories (“Fox Bread”, “The Chipmunk Beast”, “Grandfather’s Felt Boots”, “Stories of the Gamekeeper Mikhail Mikhalych”, etc.), the fairy tale “The Pantry of the Sun” and a wonderful adaptation of the autobiographical story of the Canadian Indian Vash Quonnasin "Grey Owl" 11 .

Instead of a story about a biography, you can read excerpts from “The Golden Rose” by K. G. Paustovsky (chapter “Mikhail Prishvin”).

The second part of the lesson is devoted to reading aloud (by the teacher or a previously prepared student) the beginning of the fairy tale “The Pantry of the Sun.”

At home, sixth-graders read M. Prishvin’s work to the end.

The second lesson can be devoted to an initial acquaintance with the ideological and artistic features of the fairy tale “The Pantry of the Sun”, the characters of its main characters - Nastya and Mitrasha.

The purpose of this lesson is to understand why “The Pantry of the Sun” is called a “fairy tale”. This question is very complex, so you should not try to achieve comprehensive answers in class. At this stage, students will only indicate what can be classified as a fairy tale and what could be considered a fairy tale. To this end, the following questions are proposed:

1. Where and when does the action take place in M. Prishvin’s work “The Pantry of the Sun”?

2. How does the beginning of the work resemble a fairy tale?

3. Remember artistic images, individual episodes that can be called fabulous. Think about what role they play in the work.

4. What is true in “The Pantry of the Sun”?

By highlighting fairy-tale and realistic elements, let us draw students’ attention to the fact that fairy tale elements in Prishvin's work are no more, but no less fabulous, than all the other images of the work. Consequently, everything here can be called a fairy tale and at the same time a reality. Here it is important to note the features of the writer’s style: when talking about something magical, Prishvin will carefully note “seems”, “as if”, “similar”, and if we are talking about the real, the writer will definitely emphasize the magical properties of kindness and hard work.

Thus, when analyzing, it is important to focus students’ attention on the fact that in the work “The Pantry of the Sun” “fairy tales and fairy tales never become in different ways, different components of the narrative - the essence of Prishvin’s manner is precisely that they are clearly perceptible and absolutely inseparable in every detail of the text" 12 .

The next stage of the lesson is working on the characteristics of Nastya and Mitrasha. Sample questions for conversation:

2. Highlight comparisons and epithets that help understand author's attitude to Nastya and Mitrasha. What properties of these children’s characters do you think are especially dear to the author?

3. Remember how Nastya and Mitrasha lived after the death of their mother. What kind of relationship developed between them? What do you think was most amazing about their lives?

The main content of the next lesson is understanding the conflict between Nastya and Mitrasha, its causes and consequences; spiritualization of nature, its participation in the fate of heroes.

To understand the conflict between Nastya and Mitrasha, some methodologists propose organizing a discussion that helps to arouse interest in what is read, and also promotes a conscious understanding of the work. The main questions of the lesson: who is right - Nastya or Mitrash? Whose side is the narrator on?

Another way is also possible - “following the author.” In this case, we offer a conversation with constant reference to the text. Sample questions and tasks:

1. Retell in your own words and then read the scene of the argument between Nastya and Mitrasha. Pay attention to how nature “behaves”. Is it possible to determine whose side the author is on?

2. What made Mitrasha take an uncharted path? Why did he get into trouble? How does the author relate to Mitrasha in this story? What helped Mitrasha emerge victorious from everything that happened? Support your assumptions with details from the text.

3. How did Nastya behave when she was alone? Why did she forget about her brother? What does the author condemn in Nastya’s behavior? Find artistic image, which helps to understand the author’s attitude towards Nastya.

4. Why does the writer insert into his narrative a story about a spruce and a pine tree growing together? Why is this story placed before the children appear in the forest?

5. Read the description of nature after the episode of the children’s quarrel (from the words “Then gray gloom moved tightly..." to the words "howled, groaned..."). Think about how the author helps you understand the meaning of what is happening. What is the author's attitude towards this?

6. Why did Grass come to the aid of man?

It is appropriate not only to specifically remember what personification is, but also to carry out work that will help expand and consolidate this concept. Students give examples from the “Pantry of the Sun”, when inanimate objects are endowed with the signs of living beings, plants and animals seem to acquire human properties: a black grouse greets the sun, a guard raven calls for a close fight, a pine and a spruce, old Christmas trees growing together interfere with Mitrash etc. It is important to make it clear to students that throughout the course of the story one can feel a person’s desire to comprehend and animate nature, to make it understandable, close and dear to people.

At home, students must answer in writing one of the questions proposed for conversation in class.

On next lesson after checking homework You can begin to summarize what you have learned. Main goal lesson - determine the main idea of ​​the work. Using a system of questions, the teacher will lead sixth-graders to the conclusion - the “truth” of life, its most important meaning lies in the unity of man and nature, in the kindred, wise relationship of man to nature. Using the example of the main characters, the writer strives to show the strength, beauty of man, his power and enormous capabilities. The title of the work is associated not only with peat deposits. The author means the spiritual treasures of a person who lives in nature and is her friend.

Sample conversation questions

1. Why did the writer call his work a fairy tale? What meaning did he put into these words?

After answering this question, it would be appropriate to read the writer’s dedication, placed in one of the first editions for children, “The Pantry of the Sun,” which will help to better understand the meaning of the entire work:

"Content an ordinary fairy tale- this is the struggle of a human hero with some villain (Ivan Tsarevich with the Serpent-Gorynych). And at the end of the struggle there must certainly be victory, and a fairy tale in this sense is an expression of the universal human faith in victory good start over the evil one. With this faith I walked my long literary path, with this faith I hope to finish it and pass it on as an inheritance to you, my young friends and comrades.” 13 .

2. What significance does the story of Travka have in the work?

3. What meaning does the writer give to the words “pantry of the sun”?

4. What is the significance of the dispute between Nastya and Mitrasha in the work? How is this story connected with the words: “This truth is the truth of the eternal harsh struggle of people for love”?

5. How do you imagine the narrator?

6. Read the epigraph to the chapter. How does he characterize the writer?

In conclusion, we can say that after the appearance of “Pantry of the Sun,” the Mosfilm film studio invited Prishvin to write a film script based on this work. The film was never created, but the film story entitled “The Gray Landowner” was published in the collection of works by M. M. Prishvin in 1957.

For independent reading we can recommend to students Prishvin’s work “ Ship thicket", where they will meet again with Nastya and Mitrasha.

Mikhail Mikhailovich Prishvin

“To protect nature means to protect our homeland.”

M. Prishvin

Mikhail Mikhailovich Prishvin was born on January 23, 1873, p. Khrushchevo, Yelets district, Oryol province.

Russian writer, author of works about nature, who revealed in them a special artistic philosophy of nature, hunting stories, and works for children. Of particular value are his diaries, which he kept throughout his life.

Born into a merchant family. After graduating rural school, entered the Yeletsk classical gymnasium, from where he was expelled (1888) for insolence to the teacher V.V. Rozanov. He moved to Tyumen to live with his uncle and graduated from six classes at the Tyumen Real School. In 1893 Prishvin entered the Riga Polytechnic.

So, M. Prishvin’s first book, “In the Land of Unfrightened Birds,” made him famous writer. A new name has appeared in Russian literature - Prishvin. But the road to himself was not so close for Mikhail Mikhailovich; he did not immediately find his face, which we immediately imagine when we pronounce the name Prishvin.

He wrote many books, tried different genres such as: story, essay, poem, novel, diary. But most of them were written in nature, this can be seen even by the titles of the works:

Fox bread

Zhurka

Golden Meadow

Forest Floors

Talking rook

Khromka

Inventor

Guys and ducklings

Blue bast shoe

Bear

Moose

A sip of milk

How Romka crossed the stream

Our garden

Salvation Island

Forest owner

Pantry of the sun

From childhood we are taught that nature must be loved and protected, and we must try to preserve its values, which are so necessary for humans. And among the many great Russian writers who touched on the theme of nature in their works, one still stands out from the general background. It's about about Mikhail Mikhailovich Prishvin, who was called the “old forest man” Russian literature. Love for this writer dates back to junior classes, and many carry it throughout their lives.

Man and nature in the works of Mikhail Prishvin

As soon as you start reading the works of Mikhail Prishvin, you immediately begin to understand their features. They do not have any political overtones that his contemporaries loved so much, there are no bright statements and appeals to society. All works are distinguished by the fact that their main value is the person and the world around us: nature, life, animals. And these artistic values the writer tries to convey to his reader so that he understands how important unity with nature is.

Prishvin once said:“...I write about nature, but I myself only think about people” . This phrase can be safely called system-forming in his stories, because in them we see an open and thinking person, with with a pure heart talking about true values.

Despite the fact that Prishvin survived several wars and a revolution, he never ceased to praise the man for his desire to understand life from all sides. Of course, his love for nature stands apart, because in his works not only people talk, but also trees and animals. They all help a person, and such help is mutual, which emphasizes unity.

Another great writer, Maxim Gorky, spoke very accurately about Mikhail Mikhailovich in his time. He said that he had never seen such a thing in any of the Russian writers. strong love to nature. And indeed, Prishvin not only loved nature, he tried to learn everything about it and then pass on this knowledge to his reader.

Reasoning about purity human soul

Mikhail Prishvin sincerely believed in people, trying to see only the good and positive in them. The writer believed that over the years a person becomes wiser; he compared people with trees:“...that’s how people exist, they have endured everything in the world, but they themselves become better and better until their death.” And who else but Prishvin, who survived the heavy blows of fate, should know about this.

The writer placed mutual assistance at the basis of human relationships, because a person should always find support in his friends and loved ones. He said: “The highest morality is the sacrifice of one’s personality for the benefit of the collective.” However, Prishvin’s love for man could only be matched by his love for nature. Many works are written in such a way that every phrase hides deep meaning, a discussion about the subtle relationship between man and nature.

M. Prishvin is greatest writer, which connected nature and man together. No wonder he says:“everything beautiful on earth comes from the sun, and everything good comes from man.”

Analysis of the work “Pantry of the Sun”

Genre : Pantry of the sun" -fairy tale. Because very real children go on a very real journey - for cranberries. But they have to deal with the animate forces of nature - both favorably disposed and hostile (the wolf Gray Landowner).

Characteristics of the main characters:
In the work “Pantry of the Sun,” the main characters are a brother and sister named Mitrasha and Nastya, who lost their parents, as stated in the work.

At the very beginning of the work, a description of the main characters is given. External image of Nastya :
“Nastya was like a Golden Hen on high legs. Her hair, neither dark nor light, shimmered with gold, the freckles all over her face were large, like gold coins, and frequent, and they were cramped, and they climbed in all directions. Only one nose was clean and looked up.”

Description of the image of Mitrasha: “ Mitrasha was two years younger than his sister. He was only about ten years old. He was short, but very dense, with a broad forehead and a wide nape. He was a stubborn and strong boy. “A little man in a bag,” the teachers at school called him smiling among themselves. “The little man in the bag,” like Nastya, was covered in golden freckles, and his nose, clean, like his sister’s, looked up.”

Mitrasha and Nastya were smart children: “ But very soon the smart and friendly guys learned everything themselves and began to live well. And what smart kids they were!”

It can also be noted that Mitrasha and Nastya are very hardworking:
"If possible, they joined social work. Their noses could be seen on collective farm fields, meadows, barnyard, at meetings, in anti-tank ditches: their noses are so perky.”

In particular, about Nastya, this can be noted in the following lines: “ Just like her late mother, Nastya got up far before the sun, in the predawn hour, along the shepherd's chimney. With a twig in her hand, she drove out her beloved herd and rolled back to the hut. Without going to bed again, she lit the stove, peeled potatoes, made dinner, and so busied herself with the housework until nightfall.”

And in particular about Mitrash: “ Mitrasha learned from his father how to make wooden utensils: barrels, gangs, tubs. He has a jointer that is more than twice his height. And with this ladle he adjusts the planks one to another, folds them and supports them with iron or wooden hoops.”

Despite everything, Nastya loves her brother: “ Nastya, noticing that her brother was starting to get angry, suddenly smiled and stroked him on the back of his head. Mitrash immediately calmed down, and the friends walked along the path indicated by the arrow, now no longer side by side, as before, but one after another, in single file.

And Mitrash was indeed a brave fellow: “ But not everyone could believe that a boy in his eleventh year could kill an old cunning wolf. However, several of them who believed, with a rope and a large sled, went to the indicated place and soon brought the dead Gray landowner.”
But of course, brother and sister are not at all ideal, correct and obedient children. They argue over which of them is more important.
« It happens that now Mitrasha will remember how his father taught his mother, and, imitating his father, will also decide to teach his sister Nastya. But little sister obeys, stands and smiles... Then the “little guy in the bag” begins to get angry and swagger and always say with his nose in the air: - Here's another! - Why are you showing off? - my sister objects. - Here's another! - brother is angry. - You, Nastya, swagger yourself. - No, it's you! - Here's another one!

Mitrasha loves to prove that he is right: « Having checked the direction of the trails with a compass, Mitrasha, pointing out a weak trail, said:
- We need to follow this one to the north.
- This is not a path! - Nastya answered.
- Here's another! - Mitrasha got angry. - People were walking, that means a path. We need to go north. Let's go and don't talk anymore." Because of this, he almost drowned in a swamp.

Nastya was a greedy girl : carried away by the harvest of an unprecedented cranberry harvest, I almost forgot about my brother. "At first, Nastya plucked each berry from the vine separately and bent down to the ground for each red berry. But soon she stopped bending over for one berry; she wanted more.”
“And just when she needed to remember her brother, Nastenka suddenly saw something that not every cranberry grower gets to see at least once in her life...”

But the trials they experience make children smarter and kinder. « But when evacuated Leningrad children from the orphanage turned to the village for all possible help for sick children, Nastya gave them all her healing berries. It was then that we, having gained the girl’s trust, learned from her how she suffered privately for her greed.”

The author's attitude towards the characters : The author treats his brother and sister good-naturedly, since throughout the entire work he only speaks about them kind words. He affectionately calls the boy Mitrash or the little man in the bag,” “hunter with a double visor,” or he also affectionately calls Nastya “chicken.”

Speech characteristics heroes: the speech of the two heroes is colloquial, because children use the words “Palestinian”, “get along”, etc.
In addition, it can be noted that Mitrasha always uses exclamatory sentences, which shows his courage and masculinity, for example, “Let him try!

You can also say that the author uses the sounds of various animals in the work: “Tek-tek! - a huge bird, a capercaillie, taps barely audibly in the dark forest. - Shvark-shvark! - a wild drake flew in the air over the river. - Quack-quack! - wild mallard duck on the lake. - Gu-gu-gu... - a beautiful bullfinch bird on a birch tree.”

Features of the plot and composition: Prishvin is very attentive to children. He has a gentle humor and great love describes two independent peasant children who know how to cope with a large farm. Prishvin, in the images of his brother and sister, affirms peasant thoroughness, love of work, practical acumen and the ability to deal with difficulties.
The name “Pantry of the Sun” is a multi-valued image. The “pantry of the sun” is not only peat, which can be used as a source of energy. This is all the reserved northern nature, this is kind heart people. Prishvin is a great connoisseur and lover of nature. He poetically describes the awakening spring nature, the voices of birds and animals merging into a single magical choir of the Russian forest.

Educational value: Prishvin, in his fairy tale, instills in children an aesthetic sense of admiring nature, because... There is a lot of description of nature in his work. A child, reading “The Pantry of the Sun,” also develops kindness in himself, because, comparing himself with the heroes of this work, he understands that everything that is not done should be in the name of kindness, not only for himself, but also for others. This fairy tale also teaches a child not to be greedy, because... the quality of “greed” is very clearly condemned in this work.In addition, “Pantry of the Sun” educates children that it is simply necessary to listen to other people’s opinions, otherwise they can make a lot of mistakes. In addition, it is possible to determinethat this work teaches a child to be brave and hardworking.